EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 376 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 376 (2026) 05015 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 376, 2026
6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Nanomaterials (ICRAMEN 2026)
Article Number 05015
Number of page(s) 26
Section Civil Engineering and Sustainable Infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637605015
Published online 01 July 2026
  1. Chaowana, K., Wisadsatorn, S., & Chaowana, P. (2021). Bamboo as a sustainable building material-culm characteristics and properties. Sustainability, 13(13), 7376. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jyothirmayee, S., Reddy, B. D. K., Rakesh, M., Pooja, S., Neha, T., & Naik, G. K. (2024, June). A Comparative Study on Design of Commercial Building using Etabs and Staad Pro. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2779, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hassan, H. Z., & Saeed, N. M. (2024). Advancements and applications of lightweight structures: a comprehensive review. Discover Civil Engineering, 1(1), 47. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ascione, F., Maselli, G., &Nesticò, A. (2024). Sustainable materials selection in industrial construction: A life-cycle based approach to compare the economic and structural performances of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) and steel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 475, 143641. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang, Y. Q., Ma, H. H., Zhou, G. T., & Fan, F. (2021). Parametric and comparison study of a new and traditional aluminum alloy joint systems. Advanced Steel Construction, 17(1), 50-58. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dani, A. A., Roy, K., Masood, R., Fang, Z., & Lim, J. B. (2022). A comparative study on the life cycle assessment of New Zealand residential buildings. Buildings, 12(1), 50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ostapska, K., Rüther, P., Loli, A., & Gradeci, K. (2024). Design for Disassembly: A systematic scoping review and analysis of built structures Designed for Disassembly. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 48, 377-395. [Google Scholar]
  8. Paul, B., Roy, K., Ji, Y., Fang, Z., Sivaji, V., &Lim, J. B. (2024). Moment capacity of perforated cold-formed aluminium channels-Tests, analysis, and design. Thin-walled Structures, 204, 112261. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cucuzza, R., Aloisio, A., Rad, M. M., & Domaneschi, M. (2024). Constructabilitybased design approach for steel structures: From truss beams to real-world inspired industrial buildings. Automation in Construction, 166, 105630. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cherian, P., Palaniappan, S., Menon, D., & Anumolu, M. P. (2020). Comparative study of embodied energy of affordable houses made using GFRG and conventional building technologies in India. Energy and Buildings, 223, 110138. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahmed, S., & Arocho, I. (2021). Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of a mass timber and a concrete building project. Journal of building engineering, 33, 101856. [Google Scholar]
  12. Agor, C. D., Mbadike, E. M., & Alaneme, G. U. (2023). Evaluation of sisal fiber and aluminum waste concrete blend for sustainable construction using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2814. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ullah, H., Zhang, H., Huang, B., & Gong, Y. (2024). BIM-based digital construction strategies to evaluate carbon emissions in green prefabricated buildings. Buildings, 14(6), 1689. [Google Scholar]
  14. Naqash, M. T., Alluqmani, A. E., & Farooq, Q. U. (2024). A comparative analysis of design and analysis methods for steel connections: contrasting American and European perspectives. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 15(1), 14-30. [Google Scholar]
  15. Georgantzia, E., & Kashani, M. M. (2024, May). On the use of aluminium alloys in sustainable design, construction and rehabilitation of bridges. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering (pp. 1-13). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kitayama, S., Iuorio, O., Josa, I., Borrion, A., & Black, L. (2024). Determining the carbon footprint reduction of reusing lightweight exterior infill walls: A case study of a school building in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 469, 143061. [Google Scholar]
  17. Al-Sammar, R., & Aleisa, E. (2024). Evaluating energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in fiberglass prefabricated modular structures. Energy, 310, 133234. [Google Scholar]
  18. Naqash, M. T., Khoso, S., & Noroozinejad Farsangi, E. (2024). Wind-induced structural response of skylights: A Eurocode-based assessment. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 29(1), 04023062. [Google Scholar]
  19. Di Giorgio, P., D'Eusanio, M., Serreli, M., & Petti, L. (2024). Social risks assessment of the supply chain of an aluminium semi-finished profile for window. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1-20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ubayi, S. S., Dr, B. S., Dr, E. A., Shashivendra, D., Umar, S. I., Ibrahim, A. I., & Mustapha, N. G. (2024). Shift From Traditional to Modern Building Concepts and Designs in Ringim Town: A Comparative Stusy of Aesthetics, Values, Functions and Durability. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(06). [Google Scholar]
  21. Almasri, A., Dabous, S. A., Al-Sadoon, Z. A., & Hosny, F. (2023). Evaluating the efficiency of using lightweight steel in villa construction in the United Arab Emirates: A case study. Journal of Building Engineering, 72, 106524. [Google Scholar]
  22. Singh, K. D., Yi, X., Shagolsem, L. S., & Toijam, J. (2024). Assessing Green Features of “Phumdi” as a Sustainable Material: A Comparative Analysis with Bamboo, Wood, Metal, and Plastic. Sustainability, 16(2), 637. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jyothirmayee, S., Reddy, B. D. K., Rakesh, M., Pooja, S., Neha, T., & Naik, G. K. (2024, June). A Comparative Study on Design of Commercial Building using Etabs and Staad Pro. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2779, No. 1, p. 012035). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rane, N. L., Anand, A., & Deepak, K. (2023). Evaluating the selection criteria of formwork system (FS) for RCC building construction. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 71(3), 197-205. [Google Scholar]
  25. Devi, K., & Yadav, T. (2023). Cost comparison of different types of formworks. Journal of Building Material Science, 5(1), 32-38. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mohammed, M., & Mohammed, A. H. (2023). Analysis and design of pre-engineered steel building for airbus A-380 hangar using IS codes. Proceedings on Engineering, 5(S1), 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mechaala, A., Stefaniuk, D., & Belarbi, A. (2024). Comparative performance analysis of straight and harped prestressing seven-wire strands: High-strength stainless steel vs. conventional carbon steel. Construction and Building Materials, 439, 137421. [Google Scholar]
  28. Krishna, P. V. V. S. S. R., Raju, J., Reshikesh Reddy, K., Kalyan, P. S. V. A., & Govardhan, G. (2023, September). Analysis and design of energy efficient building. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2754, No. 1). AIP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma, H. H., Zhao, C. Y., Jiang, Y. Q., Zhou, G. T., &Wang, Y. J. (2023). Rotational resistance test of a new aluminum alloy penetrating (AAP) joint system. Advanced Steel Construction, 19(2), 121-129. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhong, C. J., Feng, R. Q., Huang, Y. Q., & Li, H. Y. (2023, September). 6A13-T6 high-strength aluminium alloy columns under axial compression: Experiments, finite element analysis and design recommendations. In Structures (Vol. 55, pp. 71-84). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  31. Naqash, M. T., Khoso, S., & Noroozinejad Farsangi, E. (2024). Wind-induced structural response of skylights: A Eurocode-based assessment. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 29(1), 04023062. [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang, B., Xing, K., & Rameezdeen, R. (2023). Exploring Embodied Carbon Comparison in Lightweight Building Structure Frames: A Case Study. Sustainability, 15(20), 15167. [Google Scholar]
  33. Georgantzia, E., & Kashani, M. M. (2024, May). On the use of aluminium alloys in sustainable design, construction and rehabilitation of bridges. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Bridge Engineering (pp. 1-13). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kitayama, S., Iuorio, O., Josa, I., Borrion, A., & Black, L. (2024). Determining the carbon footprint reduction of reusing lightweight exterior infill walls: A case study of a school building in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 469, 143061. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aydogdu, I., Kilic, V., & Akin, A. (2023, September). Optimum design of pin-jointed aluminum structures to AA-ASD using three Meta-heuristic algorithms. In Structures (Vol. 55, pp. 1406-1422). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kitayama, S., & Iuorio, O. (2023). Disassembly and reuse of structural members in steel-framed buildings: state-of-the-art review of connection systems and future research trends. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 29(4), 03123006. [Google Scholar]
  37. Meng, Q., Hu, L., Li, M., & Qi, X. (2023). Assessing the environmental impact of building life cycle: A carbon reduction strategy through innovative design, intelligent construction, and secondary utilization. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100230. [Google Scholar]
  38. Khan, K., Chen, Z., Liu, J., & Javed, K. (2023). State-of-the-art on technological developments and adaptability of prefabricated industrial steel buildings. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 685. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhong, C. J., Feng, R. Q., & Huang, S. (2024, May). Engineering application study of high-performance aluminum alloy 6A13-T6. In Structures (Vol. 63, p. 106343). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bock, M., Bawazeer, J., Robinson, J., Theofanous, M., & Skalomenos, K. (2023). Structural performance of additive manufactured aluminum tubular stub columns. ce/papers, 6(3-4), 751-756. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.