EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 380 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 380 (2026) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 380, 2026
International Conference on Information Systems and Communication Technologies (ICISCT’25)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 16
Section Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Control Systems, and Energy Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638002008
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. Simon R. Cherry, James A. Sorenson, and Michael E. Phelps, Physics in Nuclear Medicine, Elsevier, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Lecoq et al., “Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge, ” Physics in Medicine &Biology, vol. 65, no. 21, p. 21RM01, Oct. 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9500 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Neumaier, B. D. Zlatopolskiy, and B. Neumaier, “Mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (mIDH) as Target for PET Imaging in Gliomas, ” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 7, p. 2890, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28072890 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Toussaint et al., “Improvement of Spatial Resolution with Iterative PET Reconstruction using UltraFast TOF, ” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 729–737, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3033561 [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Grignon et al., “Nuclear medical imaging using β + γ coincidences from 44Sc radio-nuclide with liquid xenon as detection medium, ” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 571, no. 1, pp. 142–145, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.048 [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Llosà and M. Rafecas, “Hybrid PET/Compton-camera imaging: an imager for the next generation, ” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 138, no. 3, p. 214, 2023. DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03805-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Katal et al., “Advantages and Applications of Total-Body PET Scanning,” Diagnostics (Basel), vol. 12, no. 2, Feb. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. S. Iguiniz et al., “The PETALO project, ” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 19, no. 03, p. C03059, Mar. 2024. DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/19/03/C03059 [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Zhu, Development of the XEMIS2 liquid xenon Compton camera for 3-gamma imaging: studies and optimization of scintillation light measurements, Ph.D. dissertation, École nationale supérieure Mines-Télécom Atlantique, Jun. 2021. Disponible en ligne :https://theses.hal.science/tel-03374269 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Shi, J. Lü, H. Lu, H. Y. Wang, Y.-Q. Ma, T. Hu, L. Zhou, M. Cai, L. J. Sun, B. X. Yu, J. Fang, Y. G. Xie, Z. H. An, Z. G. Wang, M. Gao, X. Li, Y. B. Xu, P. Wang, X. L. Sun, H. Wang, “Comparative studies of silicon photomultipliers and traditional vacuum photomultiplier tubes, ” Chin. Phys. C, vol. 35, p. 50, Jan. 2011. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/35/1/011 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Ogawa, “Liquid xenon calorimeter for MEG II experiment with VUV-sensitive MPPCs, ” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 845, pp. 528–532, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.085 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Hahn, R. Mirzoyan, A. Dettlaff, D. Fink, D. Mazin, and M. Teshima, “Direct comparison of SiPM and PMT sensor performances in a large-size imaging air Cherenkov telescope, ” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, vol. 1064, p. 169350, Jul. 2024. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2024.169350 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Du and T. Jones, “Technical opportunities and challenges in developing totalbody PET scanners for mice and rats, ” EJNMMI Physics, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00523-6 [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Homulle and E. Charbon, “Performance characterization of Altera and Xilinx 28 nm FPGAs at cryogenic temperatures, ” in Proc. 2017 Int. Conf. on Field Programmable Technology (ICFPT), pp. 25–31, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/FPT.2017.8280117 [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Zhao et al., “A Novel Read-Out Electronics Design Based on 1-Bit Sigma-Delta Modulation, ” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 820–828, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2648787 [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Chu et al., “Single-line multi-voltage threshold method for scintillation detectors, ” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 18, no. 06, p. P06021, Jun. 2023. DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/18/06/P06021 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Shimazoe et al., “Dynamic Time Over Threshold Method, ” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 3213–3217, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2012.2215338 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. D’Incecco, C. Galbiati, G. K. Giovanetti, G. Korga, X. Li, A. Mandarano, A. Razeto, D. Sablone, and C. Savarese, “Development of a very low-noise cryogenic preamplifier for large-area SiPM devices, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1005–1011, Apr. 2018. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2018.2799325 [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Gallice, A. Zani, P. Sala, M. Lazzaroni, M. Citterio, and A. Andreani, “Development of a design for SiPMs readout in cryogenic environment for large area photon detectors, ” in Proc. 2021 IEEE Int. Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. (I2MTC), 2021, pp. 1–6. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC50364.2021.9459995 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. D’Incecco, C. Galbiati, G. K. Giovanetti, G. Korga, X. Li, A. Mandarano, A. Razeto, D. Sablone, and C. Savarese, “Development of a novel single-channel, 24 cm2, SiPM-based, cryogenic photodetector, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 591–596, Jan. 2018. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2017.2774779 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. D. Cressler, “Operation of SiGe bipolar technology at cryogenic temperatures, ” J. Phys. IV France, vol. 4, Jun. 1994. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:1994616 [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Dinu, A. Nagai, and A. Para, “Studies of MPPC detectors down to cryogenic temperatures, ” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, vol. 787, pp. 275–279, 2015, New Developments in Photodetection NDIP14. [Online]. Available:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900214015174 [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Otono, S. Yamashita, T. Yoshioka, H. Oide, T. Suehiro, and H. Hano, “Study of MPPC at liquid nitrogen temperature, ” presented at a conference or internal report, 2007. [Online]. Available: N/A [Google Scholar]
  24. J. M. Fernândez-Tenllado, R. Ballabriga, M. Campbell, D. Gascón, S. Gómez, and J. Mauricio, “Optimal design of single-photon sensor front-end electronics for fast-timing applications, ” in Proc. 2019 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imag. Conf. (NSS/MIC), 2019, pp. 1–5. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/NSS/MIC42101.2019.9059805 [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Wang, M. Y. Guan, H. J. Qin, C. Guo, X. L. Sun, C. G. Yang, Q. Zhao, J. C. Liu, P. Zhang, Y. P. Zhang, W. X. Xiong, Y. T. Wei, Y. Y. Gan, and J. J. Li, “Characterization of VUV4 SiPM for liquid argon detector, ” J. Instrum., vol. 16, no. 07, p. P07021, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/07/P07021 [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Pershing, J. Xu, E. Bernard, J. Kingston, E. Mizrachi, J. Brodsky, A. Razeto, P. Kachru, A. Bernstein, E. Pantic, and I. Jovanovic, “Performance of Hamamatsu VUV4 SiPMs for detecting liquid argon scintillation, ” J. Instrum., vol. 17, no. 04, p. P04017, Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/04/P04017 [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Ozaki, S. Kazama, M. Yamashita, Y. Itow, and S. Moriyama, “Characterization of new silicon photomultipliers with low dark noise at low temperature, ” J. Instrum., vol. 16, no. 03, p. P03014, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/03/P03014 [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Marano et al., “Silicon Photomultipliers Electrical Model Extensive Analytical Analysis, ” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2013.2283231 [Google Scholar]
  29. S. E. Derenzo, W.-S. Choong, and W. W. Moses, “Fundamental limits of scintillation detector timing precision, ” Physics in Medicine&Biology, vol. 59, no. 13, p. 3261, 2014. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/13/3261 [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Nossent, P. Elsen, and W. Bauwens, “Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model, ” Environmental Modelling&Software, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 15151525, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.