Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 380, 2026
International Conference on Information Systems and Communication Technologies (ICISCT’25)
Article Number 02019
Number of page(s) 9
Section Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Control Systems, and Energy Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638002019
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. P. Harrison, A. Valavanis, D. Indjin, Quantum Wells, Wires and Dots: Theoretical and Computational Physics of Semiconductor Nanostructures, 4th ed. (Wiley, Chichester, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118923337 [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Michler (ed.), Single Semiconductor Quantum Dots (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87446-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Tartakovskii (ed.), Quantum Dots: Optics, Electron Transport and Future Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511998331. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Harrison, A. Valavanis, Quantum Wells, Wires and Dots: Theoretical and Computational Physics of Semiconductor Nanostructures, 4th ed. (Wiley, Chichester, 2016). DOI: 10.1002/9781118923337. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Taqi, J. Diouri, A theoretical model for exciton binding energies in rectangular and parabolic spherical finite quantum dots. Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 15, 365–369 (2012). DOI: 10.15407/spqeo15.04.365. [Google Scholar]
  6. K.L. Jahan, A. Boda, I.V. Shankar, Ch. Narasimha Raju, A. Chatterjee, Magnetic field effect on the energy levels of an exciton in a GaAs quantum dot: Application for excitonic lasers. Sci. Rep. 8, 5073 (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23348-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Heller, U. Bockelmann, G. Abstreiter, Electric-field effects on excitons in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 57, 6270–6273 (1998). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6270. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. El Khamkhami, E. Feddi, E. Assaid, F. Dujardin, B. Stébé, J. Diouri, Binding energy of excitons in inhomogeneous quantum dots under uniform electric field. Physica E 15, 99–106 (2002). DOI: 10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00448-4. [Google Scholar]
  9. C.A. Moscoso-Moreno, R. Franco, J. Silva-Valencia, Binding energy of heavy excitons in spherical quantum dots under hydrostatic pressure. Phys. Status Solidi B 246, 486–490 (2009). DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200880524 [Google Scholar]
  10. U. Yesilgul, F. Ungan, E. Kasapoglu, H. San, I. Sökmen, Effects of an intense, high-frequency laser field on the binding energy of excitons confined in a GaInNAs/GaAs quantum well. Physica B 407, 528–532 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2011.11.030. [Google Scholar]
  11. F.M.S. Lima, M.A. Amato, O.A.C. Nunes, A.L.A. Fonseca, B.G. Enders, E.F. da Silva Jr., Unexpected transition from single to double quantum well potential induced by intense laser fields in a semiconductor quantum well. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 123111 (2009). DOI: 10.1063/1.3153963. [Google Scholar]
  12. R.-B. Liu, B.-F. Zhu, Adiabatic stabilization of excitons in an intense terahertz laser. Phys. Rev. B 66, 033106 (2002). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.033106. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Sari, E. Kasapoglu, I. Sokmen, M. Gunes, Optical transitions in quantum well wires under intense laser radiation. Phys. Lett. A 319, 211–216 (2003). DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2003.10.024. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Santhi, A.J. Peter, The binding energy of excitons in a cylindrical quantum wire under the influence of laser field intensity. Physica E 42, 1643–1647 (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2010.01.016. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Hbibi, O. Mommadi, S. Chouef, R. Boussetta, L. Belamkadem, A. El Moussaouy, F. Falyouni, C.M. Duque, J.A. Vinasco, C.A. Duque, Finite confinement potentials, core and shell size effects on excitonic and electron-atom properties in cylindrical core/shell/shell quantum dots. Sci. Rep. 12, 14854 (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19118-3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.