EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 140, 2017Powders and Grains 2017 – 8th International Conference on Micromechanics on Granular Media
|Number of page(s)||4|
|Published online||30 June 2017|
A comparison between DEM and MPM for the modeling of unsteady flow
1 Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 3SR, F-38000, Grenoble, France
2 IMSRN, Montbonnot, F-38330, France
* e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Published online: 30 June 2017
In order to provide a comprehensive comparison between two current numerical methods employed in the modeling of rock avalanches, the Discrete Element Method (DEM)  and the Material Point Method (MPM)  were used to simulate the mass propagation along a 45° plane transitioning to an horizontal plane. When using the DEM, a 3D code using tetrahedral elements was used and the flow was channelized by means of frictionless walls. For the MPM simulations, a 2D code was developed and plane strain simulations were run. Comparisons were made in terms of run-out distance and energy dissipated. Influence of parameters such as initial sample geometry, basal friction coefficient and shape of blocks composing the sample was studied.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.