Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 12007 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Theory of Nuclear Reactions and Structure, Models and Codes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714612007 | |
Published online | 13 September 2017 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714612007
Multi-criteria comparative evaluation of spallation reaction models
1 National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow, Russia
2 Joint Stock Company “State Scientific Centre of the Russian Federation – Institute for Physics and Power Engineering named after A.I. Leypunsky”, Obninsk, Russia
3 Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany
4 Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Obninsk, Russia
a e-mail: korovinyu@mail.ru
Published online: 13 September 2017
This paper presents an approach to a comparative evaluation of the predictive ability of spallation reaction models based on widely used, well-proven multiple-criteria decision analysis methods (MAVT/MAUT, AHP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE) and the results of such a comparison for 17 spallation reaction models in the presence of the interaction of high-energy protons with natPb.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.