EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 183, 2018DYMAT 2018 - 12th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Section||Modelling and Numerical Simulation|
|Published online||07 September 2018|
Impact Perforation of aluminum Cymat Foam
LGM, Ecole Nationale d‘Ingénieurs de Monastir, Université de Monastir, Av. Ibn ElJazzar,
2 FOE, University of Tabuk, P.O. Box 741, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3 LMT, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 61, Av. Du president Wilson, Cachan, 94230, France
* Corresponding author : email@example.com
Published online: 7 September 2018
The behavior of aluminum Cymat foam under impact perforation loading was studied using experiments and simulations. Measurements at 40 m/s were performed with an inverse perforation setup using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bars system. Such measurement is missing in a classical free-flying penetrator–immobile–target scheme under impact loading and makes it possible to directly compare impact the perforation force–displacement curves with the static ones. Compared with quasi-static test perforation forces obtained under the same geometry and clamping system, a significantly enhanced perforation force was found under impact loading. Numerical simulations of the perforation test were developed using LS-DYNAfinite element code to provide the local information necessary to understand the unexpected enhancement in perforation force. The shock effect was found to be responsible for enhancement of the perforation force and revealed that the honeycomb model with appropriate tensile failure criteria was more suitable for model perforation of the foam than the Deshpande and Fleck model with volumetric failure strain criteria
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.