EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 183, 2018DYMAT 2018 - 12th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Section||Modelling and Numerical Simulation|
|Published online||07 September 2018|
Flow Stress of beryllium: Attempt for a Bayesian Crossed-data Analysis from Hopkinson Bars to Rayleigh-Taylor Instabilities
* e-mail: email@example.com
Published online: 7 September 2018
In this paper, we demonstrate by a Bayesian approach the incapacity of the Preston-Tonks-Wallace (PTW) strength model to represent, with the same set of parameters, the flow stress of beryllium in both moder-ate and highly dynamic experiments, and suggest hypotheses explaining that limitation. Usual plasticity models such as Johnson-Cook (JC) and PTW are mostly adjusted onto quasi-static and dynamic uni-axial compression data acquired thanks to compression machines and split Hopkinson pressure bars. Nonetheless, they may be used beyond the range of mechanical loading in which they have been fitted. This is the case of the simulations of solid Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (RTI) driven by high explosives. A recent work of Henry de Frahan et al. noticed the inability of various plasticity models to stand for the growth of beryllium RTI. Amongst them, the PTW model has been particularly examined through four different sets of parameters, each of them largely un-derestimates the growth of the experimental instability. Thus, this work is an attempt, regarding the plastic flow modeling of beryllium, to conciliate uni-axial compression tests (CT) and RTI by means of a crossed Bayesian analysis.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.