Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06046 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Advanced Modelling and Simulation | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706046 | |
Published online | 22 February 2021 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124706046
NEUTRON DEPTH PROFILE CALCULATIONS USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
1 Basic Sciences Department, Faculty of Engineering, The British University in Egypt (BUE), Sherouk City, Cairo, Egypt.
2 Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
3 Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Karim.Hossny@BUE.edu.eg
salmamagdi2004@yahoo.com
eng-fadel.nasr1520@alexu.edu.eg
eng-youssef.yasser1621@alexu.edu.eg
abdomagdy816@gmail.com
Published online: 22 February 2021
Neutron depth profiling (NDP) is a non-destructive technique used for identifying the concentration of impurity isotopes below the sample surface. NDP is carried out by detection of the emitted charged particles resulting from bombarding the sample with neutrons. NDP specifies the isotopic concentration versus the sample depth for a few micrometers below the surface. The sample is bombarded inside a research reactor using a thermal neutron beam. Charged particles like alpha particles or protons are produced from the neutron induced reactions in the sample. Each neutron isotopic interaction produces a certain Q, indicating a specific kinetic energy for the emitted charged particle. As the charged particle travels through the sample to eject the surface, it loses energy to atoms (electrons) on its path. The charged particle energy loss holds information regarding the number of atoms by which the emitted particle passed, thus indicating its original depth. The purpose of this work is to check the capability of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in predicting the boron concentration profile across a boro-silicate sample of thickness 3.5 μm divided into 10 layers. Each layer included different boron concentration than the other. Also, the boron concentration had the values {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1}. Training, validation, and test data were generated synthetically using MCNP6 in which the boron concentrations varied in the layer number from one sample to another. MCNP6 model consisted of a silicon barrier detector, boro-silicate sample, chamber body and an idealized thermal neutron source. The detector, sample, and the source were located in a voided chamber. The samples were irradiated with a 0.025 eV monoenergetic thermal neutron beam from a monodirectional disk source. To cover the whole area of the samples, the thermal neutron beam had a radius of 3 cm. The silicon detector active volume was modelled as a 100 μm thick and 3 cm radius facing the sample directly. The sample, beam, and the detector were placed on the same axis. Ten ANN regression models were developed, one for each layer boron concentration prediction where the input for each model was the alpha spectrum read by the detector, while the output was the boron concentration for each layer. Results showed regression values higher than 0.94 for all of the developed models. ANNs proved its capability of predicting the boron profile form the alpha spectrum read by the detector regarding neutron depth profiling in a boro-silicate samples.
Key words: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) / Neutron Depth Profiling / MCNP6
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.