NEUTRON EMISSION MEASUREMENTS OF PWR SPENT FUEL SEGMENTS AND PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF DEPLETION CALCULATIONS

Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Laboratory for Reactor Physics and Thermal-hydraulics (LRT) Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

gregory.perret@psi.ch
dimitri.rochman@psi.ch
alexander.vasiliev@psi.ch
hakim.ferroukhi@psi.ch

Published online: 22 February 2021

Abstract

Assessing neutron emission of LWR spent fuel is necessary for the back-end of the fuel cycle, such as the dimensioning of transport and storage casks of spent fuel. Although core and depletion codes can calculate the isotopic composition of the discharged fuel and therefore infer its neutron source, accurate measured neutron emission values remain rare mainly because of the difficulty to prepare, handle and characterize spent fuel. Measured neutron emission values are, however, extremely relevant to code validation, as neutrons emitted by LWR spent fuel mainly originates from spontaneous fissions of minor actinides (e.g., ²⁴²Cm, ²⁴⁴Cm and ²⁵²Cf) that are produced only after a large number of neutron captures in the reactor core. This paper reports on neutron emission measurements of selected LWR-PROTEUS spent fuel samples and their comparisons with a core and depletion calculation chains based on CASMO-5, SIMULATE-3 and the SNF codes. The measured LWR-PROTEUS samples are comprised of 11 samples irradiated in a Swiss PWR. The samples are UO2 or MOX and have discharge burn-ups ranging from 20 to 120 GWd/t. We measured the 40-cm long samples in a hot-cell of the Paul Scherrer Institut using a measurement station made of polyethylene and a BF3 detector. We repeated the measurements several times and in different conditions to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. We derived ratios of neutron rates emitted by the different samples and absolute neutron emission rates by comparison with a reference ²⁵²Cf source, which we re-calibrated for this exercise. The experimental uncertainty (1σ) on the absolute neutron emission varies from 3% to 4%. We compared a subset of the measured values to the calculation predictions and showed an agreement within less than 7% for all but one sample.