Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04024 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Online Computing | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104024 | |
Published online | 23 August 2021 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125104024
An automated tool to facilitate consistent test-driven development of trigger selections for LHCb’s Run 3
1 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
2 European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland
* e-mail: ross.hunter@warwick.ac.uk
** e-mail: oliver.lupton@cern.ch
*** e-mail: rosen.matev@cern.ch
**** e-mail: sascha.stahl@cern.ch
† e-mail: mika.vesterinen@warwick.ac.uk
Published online: 23 August 2021
Upon its restart in 2022, the LHCb experiment at the LHC will run at higher instantaneous luminosity and utilize an unprecedented full-software trigger, promising greater physics reach and efficiency. On the flip side, conforming to offline data storage constraints becomes far more challenging. Both of these considerations necessitate a set of highly optimised trigger selections. We therefore present HltEfficiencyChecker: an automated extension to the LHCb trigger application, facilitating trigger development before data-taking driven by trigger rates and efficiencies. Since the default in 2022 will be to persist only the event’s signal candidate to disk, discarding the rest of the event, we also compute efficiencies where the decision was due to the true MC signal, evaluated by matching it to the trigger candidate hit-by-hit. This matching procedure – which we validate here – demonstrates that the distinction between a “trigger” and a “trigger-on-signal” is crucial in characterising the performance of a trigger selection.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.