Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 257, 2022
mm Universe @ NIKA2 - Observing the mm Universe with the NIKA2 camera
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 00013 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202225700013 | |
Published online | 17 January 2022 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202225700013
Mass Estimation of Planck Galaxy Clusters using Deep Learning
1 Departamento de Física Teórica M-8 and CIAFF, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco 28049, Madrid, Spain
2 Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK
3 Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4 Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Universitá di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5-00185 Roma, Italy
5 EURANOVA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium
* e-mail: daniel.deandres@uam.es
Published online: 17 January 2022
Galaxy cluster masses can be inferred indirectly using measurements from X-ray band, Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect signal or optical observations. Unfortunately, all of them are affected by some bias. Alternatively, we provide an independent estimation of the cluster masses from the Planck PSZ2 catalog of galaxy clusters using a machine-learning method. We train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model with the mock SZ observations from The Three Hundred (the300) hydrodynamic simulations to infer the cluster masses from the real maps of the Planck clusters. The advantage of the CNN is that no assumption on a priory symmetry in the cluster’s gas distribution or no additional hypothesis about the cluster physical state are made. We compare the cluster masses from the CNN model with those derived by Planck and conclude that the presence of a mass bias is compatible with the simulation results.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.