| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2026
EFM25 – Energy & Fluid Mechanics 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01009 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801009 | |
| Published online | 12 March 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801009
Using machine learning to predict wall shear stress considering the presence of sediment in wellbores
Izmır Katip Celebi University, Civil Engineering Department, Havaalanı Sosesi No:33/2 Cigli Izmir, Turkey
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 12 March 2026
Abstract
Sediment transport is a fundamental topic that has been extensively investigated in hydraulic engineering and fluid mechanics. The shear stress acting on the particle surface is a primary variable governing sediment transport in closed conduits. In this study, the parameters influencing the wall shear stress are determined by a dimensional analysis applying the Buckingham Pi Theorem. According to dimensional analysis, the resulting wall shear stress is a function of the Reynolds number, Froude number, sediment concentration, hole inclination, and pipe rotation. The dimensionless wall shear stress coefficient is estimated using five experimentally measured inputs. The difficulty and cost of experimental studies are increasing the importance of computational approaches, including CFD and data-driven methods. Therefore, machine learning captures complex patterns without a fixed formula, provides fast alternatives for quick design checks, and quantifies uncertainty for risk-aware decisions. The features are standardized within a 5-fold cross-validation, and Ridge, Bayesian Ridge, Support Vector Regression (SVR-RBF), XGBoost, and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) are compared. The results show that XGBoost outperforms the other models with highest accuracy (R2≈0.994, RMSE ≈2.3×10-3), AAPE≈4.55%). SVR-RBF and GPR followed with ≈18.8% and ≈19.4%, respectively, while linear baselines (Ridge and Bayesian Ridge) exhibited higher errors (≥23%). These results indicate that boosted trees provide the most accurate percentage-error performance.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

