EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 358 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 358 (2026) 01009 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2026
EFM25 – Energy & Fluid Mechanics 2025
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801009
Published online 12 March 2026
  1. M. Garcia (ed.), Sedimentation engineering: processes, measurements, modeling, and practice (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784408148 [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Hassanzadeh, Hydraulics of sediment transport. In Hydrodynamics: Theory and Model, 23–58 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. N.V.K. Reddy, J.K. Pothal, R. Barik, P.K. Senapati, Pipeline slurry transportation system: An overview. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 14, 03123001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1391 [Google Scholar]
  4. M.N. Belavadi, G.A. Chukwu, Experimental study of the parameters affecting cutting transportation in a vertical wellbore annulus. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (SPE-27880) (1994). https://doi.org/10.2118/27880-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. M.M. Huque, M.A. Rahman, S. Zendehboudi, S. Butt, S. Imtiaz, Experimental and numerical study of cuttings transport in inclined drilling operations. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 208, 109394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109394 [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Rooki, F.D. Ardejani, A. Moradzadeh, V.C. Kelessidis, M. Nourozi, Prediction of terminal velocity of solid spheres falling through Newtonian and non-Newtonian pseudoplastic power-law fluid using artificial neural network. Int. J. Miner. Process. 110, 53–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2012.03.012 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Li, G. Zhang, J. Xue, Y. Li, S. Tang, Prediction of the wall factor of arbitrary particle settling through various fluid media in a cylindrical tube using artificial intelligence. Sci. World J. 2014, 438782 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/438782 [Google Scholar]
  8. E.B. Goldstein, G. Coco, A machine learning approach for the prediction of settling velocity. Water Resour. Res. 50, 3595–3601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015116 [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Al-Azani, S. Elkatatny, A. Ali, E. Ramadan, A. Abdulraheem, Cutting concentration prediction in horizontal and deviated wells using artificial intelligence techniques. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 9, 2769–2779 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0672-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Busch, S.T. Johansen, Cuttings transport: On the effect of drill pipe rotation and lateral motion on the cuttings bed. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 191, 107136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107136 [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Ozbayoglu, M. Ozbayoglu, B.G. Ozdilli, Optimization of flow rate and pipe rotation speed considering effective cuttings transport using data-driven models. Energies 14, 1484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051484 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Sarraf Shirazi, I. Frigaard, SlurryNet: Predicting critical velocities and frictional pressure drops in oilfield suspension flows. Energies 14, 1263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051263 [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Badrouchi, Hole cleaning and cuttings transportation modelling and optimization, Ph.D. thesis, University of North Dakota (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. S.D. Purwandari, B. Lund, S. Hovda, Machine learning models for predicting cuttings concentration in annulus based on flowloop experimental data. In Int. Conf. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng. (OMAE 2023) 86915, V009T11A008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2023-104720 [Google Scholar]
  15. Y.C. Ning, S. Ridha, S.U. Ilyas, S. Krishna, I. Dzulkarnain, M. Abdurrahman, Application of machine learning to determine the shear stress and filtration loss properties of nano-based drilling fluid. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 13, 1031–1052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01589-9 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Zhao, W. Huang, D. Gao, Interaction between pipe rotation and cuttings transport in extended-reach drilling: mechanism, model, and applications. SPE J. 29, 2857–2876 (2024). https://doi.org/10.2118/219483-PA [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Yang, X. Lian, C. Savari, M. Barigou, Evaluating the effectiveness of CFD-DEM and SPH-DEM for complex pipe flow simulations with and without particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 288, 119788 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.119788 [Google Scholar]
  18. R.K. Tipu, R. Bhakhar, K.S. Pandya, V.R. Panchal, Physics-informed neural networks for predicting sediment transport in pressurized pipe flows. Environ. Earth Sci. 84, 292 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12295-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Jing, J. Wang, E. Ozbayoglu, S. Baldino, Real-time, data-driven cuttings concentration estimation across a wide range of drilling conditions. In SPE ATCE 2025 (paper D011S005R006) (2025). https://doi.org/10.2118/228095-MS [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Sharma, B.T. Agyeman, M. Palimi, J. Liu, X. Zhang, Machine learning-driven pressure drop prediction in multiphase slurry hydrotransport. Powder Technol. (article 121314) (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121314 [Google Scholar]
  21. M.Y. Saad, A.M. Salem, A.F. Ibrahim, O. Mahmoud, Learning-based prediction of cuttings concentration for enhancing hole cleaning efficiency in eccentric and deviated wells. Sci. Rep. 15, 32646 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Sorgun, Modeling of Newtonian fluids and cuttings transport analysis in high inclination wellbores with pipe rotation, Ph.D. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey (2010). [Google Scholar]
  23. A.E. Hoerl, R.W. Kennard, Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12, 55–67 (1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D.J. MacKay, Bayesian interpolation. Neural Comput. 4, 415–447 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, New York, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. A.J. Smola, B. Schölkopf, A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat. Comput. 14, 199–222 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  27. C.K.I. Williams, C.E. Rasmussen, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Chen, C. Guestrin, XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. KDD ’16, 785–794 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.