| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 376, 2026
6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Nanomaterials (ICRAMEN 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05008 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| Section | Civil Engineering and Sustainable Infrastructure | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637605008 | |
| Published online | 01 July 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637605008
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Conventional RC and Monolithic Structures Using ETABS and Demand-Capacity Ratio Analysis
1 Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, India
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 1 July 2026
Abstract
The seismic vulnerability of the reinforced concrete (RC) buildings remains major concern in the earthquake prone regions where the structural discontinuities as well as insufficient stiffness result in the severe damage. In context, the present study evaluates as well as compares the seismic performance of the conventional RC framed structures and monolithic systems using the ETABS platform, based on the response spectrum analysis in accordance with IS 1893:2016. The assessment focuses on key response parameters which include the base shear, storey displacement, storey drift, as well as the storey shear, along with the structural safety evaluation using Demand Capacity Ratio (DCR). The results indicate that monolithic structural system exhibits increase in the base shear of approximately 10–11 % because the stiffness remains higher, while the reduction in storey displacement of about 15–18 % is achieved across the seismic Zones II to V. The storey drift values for the monolithic system remain within permissible limits, whereas the conventional framed structure exceeds allowable limits in the higher seismic zones. Furthermore, DCR values greater than unity are observed in the several members of the conventional frame, which indicates the potential structural vulnerability, while the monolithic system maintains values within the safe limits. The novelty of the study lies in the integrated comparative analysis which incorporates the DCR based safety evaluation across the multiple seismic zones, which provides comprehensive understanding of the structural behaviour as well as demonstrates the effectiveness of the monolithic construction in enhancing the seismic resilience.
Key words: Seismic vulnerability / ETABS / RC frame / monolithic structure / storey drift / base shear / DCR / response spectrum analysis
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

