| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 379, 2026
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials, Methodologies, Technologies & Applications in Engineering (ICS2MT-2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Structural and Geotechnical Engineering for Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637902005 | |
| Published online | 03 August 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637902005
Comparative analysis of multistorey building with and without Floating Columns
Department of Civil Engineering, Vardhaman College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 3 August 2026
Abstract
The use of floating columns (FCs) in multistorey buildings has become increasingly common because of their functional advantages, particularly in urban areas where space optimization is essential. FCs free up ground-level space for open parking and vehicle access, which is a growing concern in cities. A floating column is a vertical element that rests at its lower end on a beam rather than transferring its load directly to the foundation. In seismically active regions, however, this feature poses a significant challenge, as it can make a building more vulnerable to failure. This study investigates the effect of FCs on the structural response of a multistorey building across different seismic zones. Building models with and without FCs were developed, and linear dynamic analysis was performed in ETABS, with storey drift, base shear, and storey displacement as the main parameters. The analysis followed an iterative approach: the initial beam and column dimensions were adjusted based on the results, illustrating the need for an adaptive design process to improve both performance and cost-effectiveness. The study also considered different seismic zones, including Zone III, and Type II soil conditions, which significantly influence a building’s response to seismic forces. The results showed little difference in the values for Zone II, whereas this difference increased with higher seismic zones.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

