Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 42, 2013
WONDER-2012 – 3rd International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Evaluation of Nuclear data (Theories, Models, Codes) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20134202001 | |
| Published online | 18 March 2013 | |
- W. Mondelaers and P. Schillebeeckx, Notiziario 11, 19 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- M. Flaska, A. Borella, D. Lathouwers, L.C. Mihailescu, W. Mondelaers, A.J.M. Plompen, H. van Dam, T.H.J.J. van der Hagen, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 531, 394 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- M.C. Moxon and J.B. Brisland, “GEEL REFIT, A least squares fitting program for resonance analysis of neutron transmission and capture data computer code,” AEAInTec-0630, AEA Technology, October (1991). [Google Scholar]
- P. Schillebeeckx, B. Becker, Y. Danon et al., accepted for publication in Nuclear Data Sheets [Google Scholar]
- I. Sirakov, R. Capote, F. Gunsing, P. Schillebeeckx and A. Trkov, Ann. Nucl. En. 35, 1223 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- D. Tronc, J. M. Salomé, K.H. Böckhoff, Nucl. Istrum. Meth. A 228, 217 (1985). [Google Scholar]
- A. Borella, G. Aerts, F. Gunsing, M. Moxon, P. Schillebeeckx and R. Wynants, Nucl. Instr. Meth., A 577, 626 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- B. Becker et al., submitted to JINST [Google Scholar]
- B.J. Moyer, B. Peters and F.H. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. 66, 666 (1946) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Volev, A. Borella, S. Kopecky, C. Lampoudis, C. Massimi, A. Moens, M. Moxon, P. Schillebeeckx, P. Siegler, I. Sirakov, A. Trkov and R. Wynants, submitted to Nucl. Istrum. Meth. B [Google Scholar]
- A.D. Carlson, V.G. Pronyaev, D. L. Smith, N. M. Larson, Z. Chen, G. M. Hale, F.-J. Hambsch, E. V. Gai, Soo-Youl Oh, S. A. Badikov, T. Kawano, H. M. Hofman, H. Vonach and S. Tagesen, Nuclear Data Sheets 110, 3215 (2009) [Google Scholar]
- R.L. Macklin, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 79, (1981) 265 [Google Scholar]
- W. Ratynski and F Käppeler, Phys. Rev C 37, 595 (1988) [Google Scholar]
- A. Borella, K. Volev, A. Brusegan, P. Schillebeeckx, F. Corvi, N. Koyumdjieva, N. Janeva, A.A. Lukyanov, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 152, 1 (2006) [Google Scholar]
- G. Feinberg, M. Friedmann, A. Kràsa, A. Shor, Y. Eisen, D. Berkovits, D. Cohen, G. gioginis, T. Hirsh, M. Paul, A.J.M. Plompen and E. Tsuk, Phys. Rev C 85, 055810 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- K.K. Seth, Phys. Lett 16, 306 (1965) [Google Scholar]
- OP.A. Purtov, L.L. Litvinskii, A. Z. Murzin and G.M. Novoselov, At. Energy, 77, 536 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Klug, E. Altstadt, C. Beckert, R. Beyer, D. Freiesleben, V. Galindo, E. Grosse, A.R. Junghans, D. Legrady, B. Naumann, K. Noack, G. Rusev, K.D. Schilling, R. Schlenk, R. Schneider, A. Wagner, and F.-P. Weiss, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 577, 641 (2007) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.