EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 68 (2014) EPJ Web of Conferences, 68 (2014) 00021 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 68, 2014
ICASCE 2013 – International Conference on Advances Science and Contemporary Engineering
Article Number 00021
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20146800021
Published online 28 March 2014
  1. S. Morichi, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6, 1 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Campo, Master’s thesis, School of civil and environmental engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology (2010), http://hdl.handle.net/1863/37089 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Weinstock, W. Hook, M. Replogle, R. Cruz, Tech. rep., Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. L.V. Bin, N. Huimin, Journal of transportation system engineering and information technology 11, 45 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.M. Lehtonen, U. Seppala, Integrated manufacturing systems 8, 351 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Gao, Z. Wu, Journal of transportation systems engineering and information technology 11, 124 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Visser, A.J. van der Wees, L.O. Hertzberger, Discrete event modelling methodology for intelligent transport systems, in Proceedings of the world congress on intelligent transport systems (Torino, Italy, 2000), p. 2016 [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Alves, J. Rosmann, R. Wischnewski, World academy of science, engineering, and technology 58, 821 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. R.C. Dos Santos Silve, T.B. Brito, R.C. Botter, N.N. Pereira, Modeling of a closed-loop maritime transportation system with discrete event simulation and multi-criteria decision analysis, in proceedings of the world congress on engineering and compuer science (San Francisso, USA, 2011), Vol. II [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Valiguran, M. Folting, M. Blaho, Transport system realization in simevents tool, http://dsp.vscht.cz/konference_matlab/MATLAB09/prispevky/107_valigura.pdf (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Ancora, C. Nelli, M. Petrelli, Proceedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 54, 1250 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Yu, L. Yu, X. Chen, T. Wan, J. Guo, Journal of Public Transportation 9, 239 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Li, B. Mao, R.L. Bertini, Evaluating the impacts of bus facility design features on transit operations in Beijing, China: A simulation approach, in 87th annual meeting of the transportation research board (2008) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Widanapathiranage, J.M. Bunker, A. Bhaskar, A microscopic simulation model to estimate bus rapid transit (BRT) station service capacity with mixed stopping and non-stopping bus operation, in OPTIMUM 2013: International symposium on recent advances in transport modelling (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Fergyanto E. Gunawan, E. Kusnandar, Jurnal jalan dan jembatan 28, (2011), http://digilib.polban.ac.id/gdl.php?mod=browse&op-read&id=jbptpolban-gdl-fergyantoe-3251 [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Seibold, M. R. Flynn, A. R. Kasimov, R. R. Rosales, Constructing set-valued fundamental diagrams from jamiton solutions in second order traffic models (2013), http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.5510v2 [Google Scholar]
  17. M.R. Flynn, A.R. Kasimov, J.C. Nave, R.R. Rosales, B. Seibold, On “Jamitons”, self-sustained nonlinear traffic waves, Online Article (2008), http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.2828 [Google Scholar]
  18. M.H. Kabir, Master’s thesis, Department of Mathematics, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh (2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. TransJakarta profile book (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. C.A. O’Flaherty, D.O. Mangan, Traffic engineering and control 11, 419 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  21. M.D. Salek, R.B. Machemehl, Tec. Rep. Research Report 167211-1, Center for Transportation Research (1999), http://swutc.tamu.edu/publications/technicalreports/167211-1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Fan, R. B. Machemehl, Characterizing bus transit passenger waiting times, in 2nd material specialty conference of the Canadian society for civil engineering (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Luethi, U. Weidmann, A. Nash, Passenger arrival rates at public transport stations, Institute for transport planning and systems, ETH Zurich (2006), retrieved on July 2012, http://www.andynash.net/nash-publications/Luethi2007-pax-arrivals-TRB-paper.pdf [Google Scholar]
  24. M. K. Islam, U. Vandebona, Reliability analysis of public transit systems using stochastic simulation, in 33rd Australasian transport research forum conference (Canberra, Australia, 2010), http://www.worldtransitresearch.info/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5072&context=research [Google Scholar]
  25. Fergyanto E. Gunawan, E. Kusnandar, B. S. Abbas, A. Mazaya, C. Rijal, I.A. Permatasari, Journal of transportation system engineering and information technology (2013) (In review process) [Google Scholar]
  26. Fergyanto E. Gunawan, Erwin Kusnandar, Bahtiar Saleh Abbas, Ferdy L Pranolo, Tehdy Hartono, and Victor Pangestu. Travel time reliability of transjakarta, Indonesia bus rapid transit. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology (2013) (In review process) [Google Scholar]
  27. E E Osuna and G F Newell. Transportation Science, 21, 55 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  28. E M Holroyd and D A Scraggs. Traffic Engineering and Control, 8, 158 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  29. P I Welding. Operational research quarterly, 8, 133 (1957) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P A Seddon and M P Day. Traffic engineering and control, 15, 422 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  31. Fergyanto E. Gunawan. International journal of transportation systems and information technology 12, 77 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin Treiber, A Martin Treiber, Ansgar Hennecke, and Dirk Helbing, Physical Review E, 62, 1805, (2000) http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.