Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 17003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Poster Session (Advances in Lidar Technologies and Techniques II)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611917003
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Leon J. F., Chazette P., Pelon J., Dulac F., and Randriamiarisoa H., 2002: Aerosol direct radiative impact over the INDOEX area based on passive and active remote sensing, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107 (D19), 8006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shimizu A., Sugimoto N., Matsui I., Arao K., Uno I., Murayama T., Kagawa N., Aoki K., Uchiyama A., Yamazaki A., 2004: Continuous observations of Asian dust and other aerosols by polarization lidars in China and Japan during ACE-Asia, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109 (D19), S17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Winker D. M., Hunt W. H., and McGill M. J., 2007: Initial performance assessment of CALIOP, Geophysical Research Letters, 34(19), L19803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Holben B. N., Eck T. F., Slutsker I., Tanre D., Buis J. P., Setzer A., Vermote E., Reagan J. A., Kaufman Y. J., Nakajima J., Lavenu F., Jankowiak I., and Smirnov A., 1998: AERONET-A federate instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environment., 6, 1-16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Welton E. J., Berkoff, T. A., et al., 2010: The NASA micropulse lidar network (MPLNET): summary of the last 10 years, current status, and future plans, 25th International Laser Radar Conference, 875-878. [Google Scholar]
  6. Matthais V., et al., 2004: Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1, Instruments, Appl. Opt., 43(4), 961-976. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Welton E. J., Voss. K. J., Quinn. P. K., Flatau. P. J., Markowicz K., Campbell. J. R., Spinhirne. J. D., Gordon H. R., Johnson J. E., 2002: Measurements of aerosol vertical profiles and optical properties during INDOEX 1999 using micropulse lidars, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(D19), 8019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Welton E. J., Voss K. J., Gordon H. R., Maring H., Smirnov A., Holben B., Schmid B., Livingston J. M., Russell P. B., Durkee P. A., Formenti P., and Andreae M. O., 2000: Ground-based lidar measurements of aerosols during ACE-2: instrument description, results, and comparisons with other ground-based and airborne measurements, Tellus B., 52, 636-651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmid B., Hegg D. A., Wang J., Bates D., Redemann J., Russell P. B., Livingston J. M., Jonsson H. H., Welton E. J., Seinfeld J. H., Flagan R. C., Covert D. S., Dubovik O., and Jefferson A., 2003: Column closure studies of lower tropospheric aerosol and water vapor during ACE-Asia using airborne Sun photometer and airborne in situ and ship-based lidar measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D23), 8656. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sugimoto N., Matsui I., Liu Z., Shimizu A., Asai K., Yoneyama K., and Katsumata M., 2001: Latitudinal distribution of aerosols and clouds in the western Pacific observed with a lidar on board the research vessel Mirai, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4187-4190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanitz. T., Ansmann A., Englemann R., and Althausen D., 2013: North-south cross sections of the vertical aerosol distribution over the Atlantic Ocean from multiwavelength Raman/polarization lidar during Polarsten cruises, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 2643-2655. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.