Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 22003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Marine and Terrestrial Lidar
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Hu, Y., et al., 2008: “Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3593-3601. [CrossRef]
  2. Behrenfeld, M.J., et al. (2013), Space-based lidar measurements of global ocean carbon stocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, doi:10.1002/grl.50816. [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, X., et al. (2014), Ocean subsurface studies with the CALIPSO spaceborne lidar, J.G.R., 119, 4305–4317, doi:10.1002/2014JC009970.
  4. Behrenfeld, M. and E. Boss (2006), Beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration as alternative optical indices of phytoplankton biomass. J. Mar. Res. 64, 431-451. [CrossRef]
  5. Boss, E. et al., (2009), Acceptance angle effects on the 42 beam attenuation in the ocean. Optics Express 17(3); 1535-1550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Voss, K.J (1992), A spectral model of the beam attenuation coefficient in the ocean and coastal areas, Limn. and Ocean., 37, doi: 10.4319/10.1992.37.3.0501. [CrossRef]
  7. Churnside, J. (2014), Review of profiling oceanographic lidar, Optical Engineering, 53(5) 051405 doi: 10.1117/1.OE.53.5.051405. [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, Y. et al. (2006), A simple relation between lidar multiple scattering and depolarization for water clouds, Optics Letters, 31, 1809-1811. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hu, Y. (2007), Depolarization ratio–effective lidar ratio relation: Theoretical basis for space lidar cloud phase discrimination, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L11812, doi:10.1029/2007GL029584. [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, Y. et al. (2007), The depolarization-attenuated backscatter relation: CALIPSO lidar measurements vs. theory, Opt. Exp., 15, 5327–5332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gordon, H.R. (1989), Theoretical aspects of hydrologic optics, Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1389-1409. [CrossRef]
  12. Hair, J.W., et al. (2008), Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties, Appl. Opt., 47, 6734-6752 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hostetler, C.A et al. (2014), Applications of lidar systems for ocean ecosystem and ocean-atmosphere studies, Oc. Opt. XXII, Portland, ME, 26-31 October.
  14. Mannino, A. et al. (2013), Algorithm development and validation of CDOM properties for estuarine and continental shelf waters along the northeastern U.S. coast, Rem. Sens. of Env., 152, 576-602. [CrossRef]
  15. Kostadinov, T. S., et al. (2009), "Retrieval of the particle size distribution from satellite ocean color observations." JGR: Oceans (1978–2012) 114.C9.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.