Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 22003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Marine and Terrestrial Lidar
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Hu, Y., et al., 2008: “Sea surface wind speed estimation from space-based lidar measurements”, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 3593-3601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Behrenfeld, M.J., et al. (2013), Space-based lidar measurements of global ocean carbon stocks, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, doi:10.1002/grl.50816. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, X., et al. (2014), Ocean subsurface studies with the CALIPSO spaceborne lidar, J.G.R., 119, 4305–4317, doi:10.1002/2014JC009970. [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrenfeld, M. and E. Boss (2006), Beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration as alternative optical indices of phytoplankton biomass. J. Mar. Res. 64, 431-451. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boss, E. et al., (2009), Acceptance angle effects on the 42 beam attenuation in the ocean. Optics Express 17(3); 1535-1550. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Voss, K.J (1992), A spectral model of the beam attenuation coefficient in the ocean and coastal areas, Limn. and Ocean., 37, doi: 10.4319/10.1992.37.3.0501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Churnside, J. (2014), Review of profiling oceanographic lidar, Optical Engineering, 53(5) 051405 doi: 10.1117/1.OE.53.5.051405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu, Y. et al. (2006), A simple relation between lidar multiple scattering and depolarization for water clouds, Optics Letters, 31, 1809-1811. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu, Y. (2007), Depolarization ratio–effective lidar ratio relation: Theoretical basis for space lidar cloud phase discrimination, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L11812, doi:10.1029/2007GL029584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, Y. et al. (2007), The depolarization-attenuated backscatter relation: CALIPSO lidar measurements vs. theory, Opt. Exp., 15, 5327–5332. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon, H.R. (1989), Theoretical aspects of hydrologic optics, Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1389-1409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hair, J.W., et al. (2008), Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar for profiling aerosol optical properties, Appl. Opt., 47, 6734-6752 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hostetler, C.A et al. (2014), Applications of lidar systems for ocean ecosystem and ocean-atmosphere studies, Oc. Opt. XXII, Portland, ME, 26-31 October. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mannino, A. et al. (2013), Algorithm development and validation of CDOM properties for estuarine and continental shelf waters along the northeastern U.S. coast, Rem. Sens. of Env., 152, 576-602. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kostadinov, T. S., et al. (2009), "Retrieval of the particle size distribution from satellite ocean color observations." JGR: Oceans (1978–2012) 114.C9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.