EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 119 (2016) EPJ Web of Conferences, 119 (2016) 25018 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 25018
Number of page(s) 4
Section Poster Session (Advances in Lidar Technologies and Techniques III)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611925018
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Sungwook, H, 2010: Surface roughness and polarization ratio in microwave remote sensing, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(10), 2709-2716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zheng, X. M., Zhao, K, 2010: A method for surface roughness parameter estimation in passive microwave remote sensing. Chinese Geographical Science, 20(4), 345-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin, S., Leonie, D. F., Jo-Ann, H.; Felix, W., 2010: Fast derivation of soil surface roughness parameters using multi-band SAR imagery and the Integral Equation Model. 2010 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, IEEE computer society, 3931-3934. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, S. G., Li, X, Han, X. J., Jin, R., 2011: Estimation of surface soil moisture and roughness from multi-angular ASAR imagery in the Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research (WATER). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1415-1426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali Saleh., 1993: Soil roughness measurement: Chain method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 48(6), 527-529. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oh, Y., Hong, J. Y., Jung, S. G., 2007: Retrieval of Soil Moisture and Surface Roughness from Backscatter Measurements of Vegetation Canopy. Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, 1-3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tang, X. J., Xiao, H., Ding, H., Liu, J. H., 2009: Surface roughness measurement based on image processing and image recognition. Computers and Simulation in Modern Science. 91-96. [Google Scholar]
  8. McDonald, A. J., Crossley, S., Bennett, J. C, Cookmartin, G., Morrison, K., Quegan, S., 1999: Stereo vision measurements of soil surfaces and their utility in testing microwave backscattering models. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 5, 2634 - 2636. [Google Scholar]
  9. Garcia Morenoa, R., Diaz Alvarezb, M.C., Saa Requejob, A., Valencia Delfac, A.M., 2010: Tarquisb Multiscaling analysis of soil roughness variability. Complexity and Nonlinearity in Soils. 160(1), 22–30. [Google Scholar]
  10. Šařec, P., Šařec, O., Prošek, V., Čížková, K., 2007: Laser profilometer testing by laboratory measurements. RES. AGR. ENG., 53 (1), 1-7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Russell T., Rocco, P., Mihai A. Tanase, Kim L., Jorg M. Hacker, Jeffrey P. Walker. 2014: Estimation of soil surface roughness of agricultural soils using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment, 140, 107-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shi, X., Girod, L., Long, R., DeKett, R., Philippe, J., Burke, Tom. 2012: A comparison of LiDAR-based DEMs and USGS-sourced DEMs in terrain analysis for knowledge-based digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 170, 217-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, X. J., Zhao, K., Zheng, X. M., 2012: Development of surface roughness tester based on laser triangulation method. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 28(8), 116-121. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sui, H.G., Peng, F. F., Xu, C., Sun, K.M., Gong, J.Y., 2012: GPU-accelerated MRF segmentation algorithm for SAR images. Computers & Geosciences, 43, 159-166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Devrim, A., Pakize, E.¸ 2015: GPU accelerated training of image convolution filter weights using genetic algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 585-594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., Fung, A. K., 1987: Microwave remote sensing active and passive. Radar remote sensing and surface scattering and emission theory, 2, 819-833. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mielikainen, J., Huang, B. M., Huang, H. L. A, Goldberg, M. D., 2012: Improved GPU/CUDA Based Parallel Weather and Research Forecast (WRF) Single Moment 5-Class (WSM5) Cloud Microphysics. Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5(4), 1256-1265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.