Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Fission Physics and Observables
Published online 13 September 2017
  1. J. Randrup, P. Talou, and R. Vogt, in preparation (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024601 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 84, 044621 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Vogt, J. Randrup, D.A. Brown, M.A. Descalle, and W.E. Ormand, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024608 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044602 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Vogt and J. Randrup, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064623 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Randrup and R. Vogt, Phys. Rev. C 89, 044601 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Romano, Y. Danon, R. Block, J. Thompson, E. Blain, and E. Bond, Phys. Rev. C 81, 014607 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sh. Zeynalov, F.-J. Hambsch, and S. Oberstedt, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59, 1396 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Budtz-Jørgensen and H.-H. Knitter, Nucl. Phys. A490, 307 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F.-J. Hambsch and S. Oberstedt, Nucl. Phys. A617, 347 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Göök, F.-J. Hambsch, and M. Vidali, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064611 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E.M. Kozulin, A.A. Bogachev, M.G. Itkis, I.M. Itkis, G.N. Knyazheva, N.A. Kondratiev, L. Krupa, I.V. Pokrovsky, and E.V. Prokhorova, Inst. and Exp. Techniques 51, 44 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.L. Whetstone, Jr., Phys. Rev. 131, 1232 (1963) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G.K. Mehta, J. Poitou, M. Ribrag, and C. Signarbieux, Phys. Rev. C 7, 373 (1973) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.C. Wahl, Los Alamos Technical Report, LA-13298 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  17. M.E. Rising, A.K. Prinja, and P. Talou, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 175, 188 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. The legend '1000@1M' on the calculated curves in Figs. 3 and 5–13 indicates that the results are based on 1000 sampled yield functions, for each of which one million complete fission events have been generated by FREYA; the legend ‘407@1M (—dν—¡0.05)’ in Fig. 13 indicates that the results are based on the 407 yield functions for which the resulting average neutron multiplicity deviates less than 0.05 from the specified target value (namely the overall mean multiplicity). In Figs. 5, 7, 9, 11, 12 (bottom) the legend ‘1000*ave’ indicates that the average yield function has been repeatedly used for a total of 1000 times (each time with a new sample of one million FREYA events) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.D. Carlson, V.G. Pronyaev, D.L. Smith, et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 110, 3215 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.