Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2017
ND 2016: International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology
Article Number 09034
Number of page(s) 5
Section Nuclear Data for Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714609034
Published online 13 September 2017
  1. W. Wieselquist, T. Zhu, A. Vasiliev, and H. Ferroukhi, “PSI Methodologies for Nuclear Data Uncertainty Propagation with CASMO-5M and MCNPX: Results for OECD/NEA UAM Benchmark Phase I”, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 15 (2013)
  2. H. Ferroukhi, O. Leray, M. Hursin, A. Vasiliev, G. Perret, and A. Pautz, “Study of Nuclear Decay Data Contribution to Uncertainties in Heat Load Estimations for Spent Fuel Pools”, Nucl. Data Sheets 118(1), 498–501 (2014) [CrossRef]
  3. M. Hursin, G. Perret, and A. Pautz, “Verification of the new implementations in SHARKX against TSUNAMI to perform pinpower UQ and representativity analysis”, Ann. Nucl. Energy 77, 300–309 (2015) [CrossRef]
  4. F. Bostelmann, F.-P. Weiss, A. Aures, K. Velkov, W. Zwermann, B.T. Rearden, M.A. Jessee, M.L. Williams, D. Wiarda, and W. Wieselquist, “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Criticality Calculations with Perturbation Theory and Sampling”, in Proceedings of ANS MC2015
  5. W. Zwermann, B. Krzykacz-Hausmann, L. Gallner, and A. Pautz, “Influence of Nuclear Covariance Data on Reactor Core Calculations”, in WONDER 2009
  6. B.T. Rearden, “Overview of SCALE 6.2”, in Proceedings of ANS NCSD, Wilmington, NC, 2009
  7. K. Ivanov, M. Avramova, S. Kamerow, I. Kodeli, E. Sartori, E. Ivanov, and O. Cabellos, “Benchmark for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for Design, Operation and Safety Analysis of LWRs, Volume I: Specification and Support Data for the Neutronics Cases (Phase I)”, Report, no. Version 2.1, NEA/NSC/DOC(2012)10, 2016
  8. M.L. Williams, B.L. Broadhead, and C.V Parks, “Eigenvalue Sensitivity Theory for Resonance-Shielded Cross Sections”, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 177–191 (2001) [CrossRef]
  9. B. Foad and T. Takeda, “Importance of self-shielding for improving sensitivity coefficients in light water nuclear reactors”, Ann. Nucl. Energy 63, 417–426 (2014) [CrossRef]
  10. A. Aures, F. Bostelmann, M. Hursin, and O. Leray, “Benchmarking and Application of the State-of-the-Art Uncertainty Analysis Methods XSUSA and SHARK-X”, Ann. Nucl. Energy, under review, 2016
  11. “SCALE: A Comprehensive Modeling and Simulation Suite for Nuclear Safety Analysis and Design.” Oak Ridge, TN. Available from Radiation Safety Information Computational Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory as CCC-785, 2011
  12. A. Gandini, G. Palmiotti, and M. Salvatores, “Equivalent generalized perturbation theory (EGPT)”, Ann. Nucl. Energy 13(3), 109–114 (1986) [CrossRef]
  13. M. Hursin, D. J. Siefman, G. Perret, P. Grimm, and A. Pautz, “Verification of the new implementations in SHARK-X for reactivity coefficients and relative reactivity worth UQ”, in PHYSOR 2016 - Unifying Theory and Experiments in the 21st Century, 2016
  14. A. Santamarina and D. Bernard, “Biases and Uncertainties in Doppler reactivity worth calculations”, in UAM-9 Meeting, 2015

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.