Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 157, 2017
22 Topical Conference on Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 4
Section Standard Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201715703007
Published online 23 October 2017
  1. J. Freidberg, J., Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy, (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. G. L. Jackson, et al., Regime of very high confinement in the boronized DIII-D tokamak. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. D. Conway, et al., Suppression of Plasma Turbulence During Optimized Shear Configurations in JET, Phys. Rev. Letters 84, 1463 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Fasoli, Computational challenges in magnetic-confinement fusion physics, Nature Physics, nphys3744 (2016). G. Giruzzi, et al., Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios. Nuclear Fusion, 55, Number 7, 073002 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Giruzzi, G., et al., Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios. Nuclear Fusion, 55, Number 7, 073002 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Fisch, Theory of current drive in plasmas, Rev. Modern Physics 59, 175–234 (1987). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Cesario, et al., Current drive at density required by thermonuclear reactors, Nature Communications, 1 (5) 55 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. F. F. Karney and N. J. Fisch, Numerical studies of current generation by radio-frequency traveling waves, Phys. Fluids 22, No. 9, 1817 (1979). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Cardinali et al., to be pub. Scientific Reports [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Cardinali et al., to be pub. on Plasma Phys Control. Fusion [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Brambilla, Kinetic Theory of Plasma Waves (Oxford Press, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Bernabei, et al., Lower-Hybrid Current Drive in the PLT Tokamak, Phys. Rev. Letters 49, 1255–1258 (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Cesario, et al., Spectral broadening of parametric instability in lower hybrid current drive at a high density. Nucl. Fusion 54, 043002 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Cesario, et al., Modelling of Lower Hybrid Current Drive in Tokamak Plasmas by including the Spectral Broadening induced by Parametric Instability, Phys. Rev. Letters 92 17 175002 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Cesario, et al., Spectral broadening of lower hybrid waves produced by parametric instability in current drive experiments on tokamak plasmas, Nucl. Fusion 46, 462–476 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Zohm et al., Assessment of the heating and current drive system capabilities for DEMO, Proc. of the 40th European Phys. Society Conf. on Plasma Physics, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Gormezano, et al., Lower-hybrid plasma heating via a new launcher – the multijunction grill, Nucl. Fusion 25, 419 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Diamond, P.H., Itoh, S. and Itoh, K., Modern Plasma Physics (Vol.1, Cambridge University Press, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonoli, P., and Englade, R.C., Simulation Model for Lower Hybrid Current Drive, Phys. Fluids 29, 2937 (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Landau, L., On the vibration of the electronic plasma, Journal of Physics, Vol X, No. 1, 25 (1946). [Google Scholar]
  21. Diamond, P.H., Itoh, S. and Itoh, K., Modern Plasma Physics (Vol.1, Cambridge University Press, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  22. Drummond W. E. and Pines D., Non linear stability of plasma oscillations, Nuclear Fusion Suppl., Part 3 1049 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  23. Peysson, Y., Advances in modeling of lower hybrid current drive, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58 , 044008 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Crisanti, F., et al., JET Quasistationary Internal-Transport-Barrier Operation with Active Control of the Pressure Profile, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 145004 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.