Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 171, 2018
17th International Conference on Strangeness in Quark Matter (SQM 2017)
Article Number 12002
Number of page(s) 8
Section New Experiments and New Facilities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817112002
Published online 02 February 2018
  1. B. Jacak, B. Müller, Science 337, 310 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Fukushima, T. Hatsuda, Rept. Prog. Phys. 74:014001,2011. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Foka, M.-A. Janik, Reviews in Physics 1, 154-171 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz, Acta Phys.Polon. B42 (2011) 2791-2810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. McLerran and R. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. A 796 (2007) 83. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Fischer et al., Locating the critical end point of QCD, Nucl. Phys. A 931 (2014) 774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.B. Ivanov, V.N. Ruuskikh, V.D. Toneev, Phys. Rev. C 73, 44904 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Friman et al. (Eds), The CBM Physics Book: Compressed Baryonic Matter in Laboratory Experiments, Springer Series: Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 814 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Ablyazimov et al. [CBM collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (2016) 60. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 596 (2004) 61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Agakishiev et al. [HADES collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 132301, (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Adamczyk et al. [STAR collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 142301 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Chung et al. [E895 collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 940 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Zinyuk et al. [FOPI collaboration], Phys. Rev. C 90, 025210 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Shin et al. [KAOS collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1576 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, H. Stöcker, Phys. Lett. B 697, 201 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Stöcker et al., Nucl. Hys. A 827, 624c (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Steinheimer, A. Botvina, M. Bleicher, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014911 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Karsch, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 779, 012015 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. X. Luo et al. [STAR collaboration], PoS CPOD 2014, 019 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Lorenz [HADES collaboration], Nucl. Phys. A 967, 27 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Arnaldi et al. [NA60 Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J C 61 (2009) 711. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. P.M. Hohler, R. Rapp, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 267-278, (2016) 253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Galatyuk et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) 131. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Friese, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7125 (2012) 17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. de Cuveland and V. Lindenstruth, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 022006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. V. Friese, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Kisel, EPJ Web Conf. 108 (2016) 01006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. The CBM collaboration, STS-TDR, GSI-2013-05499, http://repository.gsi.de/record/54798. [Google Scholar]
  30. The CBM collaboration, TOF-TDR, GSI-2015-01999, http://repository.gsi.de/record/109024. [Google Scholar]
  31. The CBM collaboration, PSD-TDR, GSI-2015-02020, http://repository.gsi.de/record/109059. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.