Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidar applications in atmospheric dynamics and surface exchanges: Boundary layer, winds and turbulence
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Arend, M; Abdelazim, S., Lopez, M., Moshary, M., 2013: A comparison of two embedded programming techniques for high rep rate coherent Doppler lidars, Proc. SPIE 8731, Laser Radar Technology and Applications XVIII, 87310E (May 28, 2013); doi:10.1117/12.2016018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdelazim, S., Santoro, D., Arend, M. F., Moshary, F., Ahmed, S., 2015: Development and Operational Analysis of an All-Fiber Coherent Doppler Lidar System for Wind Sensing and Aerosol Profiling, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on 53 (12), 6495-6506. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdelazim, S., Santoro, D., Arend, M., Moshary, F., Ahmed, S., 2016: Signal to Noise Ratio Characterization of Coherent Doppler Lidar Backscattered Signals, EPJ Web of Conferences 119 17014, DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201611917014 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdelazim, S., Santoro, D., Arend, M., Moshary, F., & Ahmed, S. 2015: The challenges of implementing and testing two signal processing algorithms for high rep-rate coherent Doppler lidar for wind sensing, Proc. SPIE 9474, Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXIV, 94741B, DOI:10.1117/12.2176897. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gan, C., Y. Wu, B. Madhavan, B. Gross, F. Moshary, 2011: Application of active optical sensors to probe the vertical structure of the urban boundary layer and assess anomalies in air quality model PM2.5 forecasts, Atmos. Environ., 45 (37), 6613-6621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vladutescu, V., Wu, Y., Gross, B., Moshary, F., Ahmed, S.,Blake, R., Razani, M., 2012: Remote Sensing Instruments used for Measurement and Model Validation of Optical Parameters of Atmospheric Aerosols IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement 61, 1733-1746 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arend, M. F., Gutiérrez, E. J., Gonzalez, J. E., Moshary, F., Bornstein, B., Martilli, A., 2014, Vertical Profiles and Horizontal Distributions of Observed and Modeled Wind and Pressure Fields Over the NYC Metro Area During Superstorm Sandy as a Tool for Understanding Impacts and Risks for a Vertically Built Environment, AMS Annual Meeting, Atlanta GA, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Arend, M., Valerio, I., Neufeld, S., Bishir, B., Wu, Y., Moshary, F., Melecio-Vazquez, D., and Gonzalez, J., 2016: Exploring the Turbulent Urban Boundary by Use of Lidars and Microwave Radiometers, EPJ Web of Conferences 119 15005, DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201611915005 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Melecio-Vázquez, D., González-Cruz, J.E., Arend, M., Han, Z., Dempsey, M., Booth, J., Gutierrez, E. and Tongue, J., 2015: New York Metro-Area Boundary Layer Catalogue: Boundary Layer Height and Stability Conditions from Long-Term Observations. 9th International Conference on the Urban Climate jointly with 12th Symposium on the Urban Environment. July 20-24, 2015, Centre de Congres Pierre Baudis, Toulouse, France. URL: [Google Scholar]
  10. Melecio D., and J. Gonzalez, P. Ramamurthy, and M. Arend, 2016: The Structure and Evolution of the Urban Boundary Layer During an Extreme Heat Event, 22nd Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence. June 20-24, 2016, Sheraton Salt Lake City Hotel, Salt Lake City, UT. Conference Presentation. [Google Scholar]
  11. Melecio D., J. Gonzalez, P. Ramamurthy, and M. Arend, 2017: Modeling and Observations of the Structure and Evolution of the Urban Boundary Layer of New York City, 97th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting: 13th Symposium of the Urban Environment. January 22-27, 2017, Washington State Convention Center, Seattle, WA. Conference Presentation. [Google Scholar]
  12. ASCE. 2010. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. ASCE/SEI Standard 7-10 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.