Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 176, 2018
The 28th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 28)
Article Number 08016
Number of page(s) 4
Section Synergy of lidars and other sensors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817608016
Published online 13 April 2018
  1. Kalthoff, N., M. Kohler, C. Barthlott, B. Adler, S.D. Mobbs, U. Corsmeier, K. Träumner, T. Foken, R. Eigenmann, L. Krauss, S. Khodayar and P. Di Girolamo, 2011. The dependence of convectionrelated parameters on surface and boundary-layer conditions over complex terrain, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 137, 70-80, doi: 10.1002/qj.686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wulfmeyer V., H. Bauer, P. Di Girolamo, C. Serio, 2005: Comparison of active and passive water vapour remote sensing from space: An analysis based on the simulated performance of IASI and space borne differential absorption Lidar, Remote Sens. Environ. 95, 211-230, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wulfmeyer, V., R. M. Hardesty, D. D. Turner, A. Behrendt, M. P. Cadeddu, P. Di Girolamo, P. Schlüssel, J. Van Baelen, and F. Zus, 2015: A review of the remote sensing of lower tropospheric thermodynamic profiles and its indispensable role for the understanding and the simulation of water and energy cycles, Rev. Geophys. 53, 819–895, doi:10.1002/2014RG000476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Girolamo, P., C. Flamant, M. Cacciani, E. Richard, V. Ducrocq, D. Summa, D. Stelitano, N. Fourrié and F. Saïd, 2016: Observation of low-level wind reversals in the Gulf of Lion area and their impact on the water vapour variability, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 142 (Suppl 1), 153–172, doi: 10.1002/qj.2767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Girolamo, P., D. Summa, R. Ferretti, 2009: Multiparameter Raman Lidar Measurements for the Characterization of a Dry Stratospheric Intrusion Event, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech. 26, 1742-1762, doi: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1253.1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Summa D., Di Girolamo P., Stelitano D. and Cacciani M., 2013: Characterization of the Planetary boundary layer height and structure by Raman lidar: Comparison of different approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 3515-3525, doi: 10.5194/amt-6-3515-2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Di Girolamo, D. Summa, B. De Rosa, M. Cacciani, A. Scoccione, A. Behrendt, V. Wulfmeyer, 2017: Characterization of Boundary Layer Turbulent Processes by Raman Lidar: Demonstration of the Measurement Capabilities of the Raman Lidar System BASIL, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 745-767, doi:10.5194/acp-17-745-2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Di Girolamo, P., A. Behrandt, and V. Wulfmeyer (2006). Spaceborne profiling of atmospheric temperature and particle extinction with pure rotational Raman Lidar and of relative humidity in combination with differential absorption Lidar: performance simulations, Appl. Opt. 45, 2474-2494, ISSN: 0003-6935, doi: 10.1364/AO.45.002474. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Girolamo P., D. Summa, R.-F Lin, T. Maestri, R. Rizzi, G. Masiello, 2009: UV Raman Lidar measurements of relative humidity for the characterization of cirrus cloud microphysical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 8799-8811, doi: 10.5194/acp-9-8799-2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruneau D, Quaglia P, Flamant C, Meissonnier M, Pelon J., 2001: Airborne lidar LEANDRE II for water-vapor profiling in the troposphere. I: System description, Appl. Opt. 40, 3450–3461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruneau D, Quaglia P, Flamant C, Pelon J., 2001b: Airborne lidar LEANDRE II for water-vapor profiling in the troposphere. II: First results. Appl. Opt. 40, 3462–3475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhawar, R., P. Di Girolamo, D. Summa, C. Flamant, D. Althausen, A. Behrendt, C. Kiemle, P. Bosser, M. Cacciani, C. Champollion, T. Di Iorio, R. Engelmann, C. Herold, Müller, D., S. Pal, M. Wirth, V. Wulfmeyer, 2011: The Water Vapour Intercomparison Effort in the Framework of the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study: Airborne-to-Ground-based and airborne-to-airborne Lidar Systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 137, 325–348, doi:10.1002/qj.697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.