Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 179, 2018
International Workshop on “Flavour Changing and Conserving Processes” (FCCP2017)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817901001
Published online 23 May 2018
  1. J. Bijnens, EPJ Web Conf. 118, 01002 (2016) [arXiv:1510.05796 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. D’Ambrosio, M. Iacovacci, M. Passera, G. Venanzoni, P. Massarotti and S. Mastroianni, EPJ Web Conf. 118 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Knecht, General discussion on g – 2 [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Colangelo, Dispersion relations for hadronic light -by -light scattering [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Lehner, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g – 2 on the lattice [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Nyffeler, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon g – 2 on the lattice [Google Scholar]
  7. G. W. Bennett et al. [Muon g-2 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006) [hep-ex/0602035]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Bijnens and J. Prades, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 767 (2007) [hep-ph/0702170]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Prades, E. de Rafael and A. Vainshtein, “Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment,” (Advanced series on directions in high energy physics. 20) [arXiv:0901.0306 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rept. 477, 1 (2009) [arXiv:0902.3360 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Lehner, Report from the Muon g-2 Theory Initiative at Fermilab, see also https://indico.fnal.gov/event/13795/page/13 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1447 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3781 (1995)] [hep-ph/9505251]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 379 (1996) [hep-ph/9511388]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 626, 410 (2002) [hep-ph/0112255]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Bijnens and J. Relefors, JHEP 1609, 113 (2016) [arXiv:1608.01454 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, W. Heupel and R. Williams, arXiv:1411.7876 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 65, 073034 (2002) [hep-ph/0111058]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B 322, 239 (1994) [hepph /9311316]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 790 (1995) [hep-ph/9503463]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3137 (1996) [hep-ph/9601310]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Hayakawa and T. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. D 57, 465 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. [Phys. Rev. D 66, 019902 (2002)] [hepph /9708227]. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Bijnens, C. Bruno and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B 390, 501 (1993) [hep-ph/9206236]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Bijnens, Phys. Rept. 265, 369 (1996) [hepph /9502335]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Knecht, A. Nyffeler, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 071802 (2002) [hepph /0111059]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 041601 (2002) [hep-ph/0201297]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. A. E. Dorokhov and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. D 78, 073011 (2008) [arXiv:0805.0760 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer and R.Williams, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094006 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. [Phys. Rev. D 86, 099901 (2012)] [arXiv:1012.3886 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  31. L. Cappiello, O. Cata and G. D’Ambrosio, Phys. Rev. D 83, 093006 (2011) [arXiv:1009.1161 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Greynat and E. de Rafael, JHEP 1207, 020 (2012) [arXiv:1204.3029 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 79, 073012 (2009) [arXiv:0901.1172 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Roig, A. Guevara and G. López Castro, Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 7, 073016 (2014) [arXiv:1401.4099 [hepph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, JHEP 1409, 091 (2014) [arXiv:1402.7081 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. D. K. Hong and D. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 680, 480 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4042 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113006 (2004) [hep-ph/0312226]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 738, 6 (2014) [arXiv:1408.2517 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Bijnens and M. Z. Abyaneh, EPJ Web Conf. 37, 01007 (2012) [arXiv:1208.3548 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Z. Abyaneh, arXiv:1208.2554 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  41. K. T. Engel, H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 86, 037502 (2012) [arXiv:1201.0809 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 062002 (2015) [arXiv:1405.6377 [hepex]]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. K. T. Engel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Lett. B 738, 123 (2014) [arXiv:1309.2225 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. K. Kampf et al., arXiv:1308.2575 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Benayoun et al., arXiv:1407.4021 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  46. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B 321, 311 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Leupold, private communication. [Google Scholar]
  48. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no. 23, 232001 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.232001 [arXiv:1701.06554 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, JHEP 1704, 161 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)161 [arXiv:1702.07347 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer and R.Williams, Phys. Rev. D 87, no. 3, 034013 (2013) [arXiv:1210.1759 [hepph]]. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  51. A. E. Dorokhov, A. E. Radzhabov and A. S. Zhevlakov, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no. 9, 417 (2015) [arXiv:1502.04487 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. R. Boughezal and K. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. B 704, 193 (2014) [arXiv:1104.4510 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. P. Masjuan and M. Vanderhaeghen, arXiv:1212.0357 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  54. F. Jegerlehner, talk presented at the workshop on Hadronic contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment: strategies for improvements of the accuracy of the theoretical prediction, 1-5 April 2014, Waldthausen Castle near Mainz. [Google Scholar]
  55. F. Jegerlehner, EPJ Web Conf. 118, 01016 (2016) [arXiv:1511.04473 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, no. 8, 3008 (2014) [arXiv:1401.0832 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.