Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 183, 2018
DYMAT 2018 - 12th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
Article Number 02039
Number of page(s) 4
Section Experimental Techniques
Published online 07 September 2018
  1. M. A. Meyers, Dynamic behavior of materials, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Forquin, F. Hild, A probabilistic damage model of the dynamic fragmentation process in brittle materials (Advances in Applied Mech. Giessen & Are feds. 44, 1-72. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Forquin Brittle materials at high-loading rates: an open area of research. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (375) 20160436. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0436 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. M.F. Kanninen, C.H. Popelar. Advanced fracture mechanics. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 1985. 3. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. E. Edgerton and F. E. Barstow, Futher studies of glass fracture with high-speed photography, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 24 (4) 131–137 (1941) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Broek. Elementary engineering fracture mechanics. the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Strassburger, H. Senf. Experimental investigations of wave and fracture phenomena in impacted ceramics and glasses, Ernst Mach Institute (1995) [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Ravi-Chandar, W. G. Knauss. An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: III. On steadystate crack propagation and crack branching, Int. J. Fract., 26 (2), 141–154 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Forquin, An optical correlation technique for characaterizing the crack velocity in concrete, European Physical J. ST (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Forquin and R. Cheriguène, A rocking spalling test to characterize the crack velocity in concrete, in Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Proulx T. (eds)., vol. 6, New York: Springer (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. J.R. Klepaczko, A. Brara. An experimental method for dynamic tensile testing of concrete by spalling. Int. J. Impact Eng. 25, 387–409 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Erzar, P. Forquin. An experimental method to determine the tensile strength of concrete at high rates of strain. Experimental Mechanics, 50 (7), 941-955 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Denoual, F. Hild. A Damage Model for the Dynamic Fragmentation of Brittle Solids, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 247–258 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Weibull. A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Roy. Swed. Inst. Eng. Res, 151 (1939) [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Weibull. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293-297 (1951) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.G.S. Davies. The statistical approach to engineering design in ceramics. Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22, 429–452 (1973) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. L. Zinszner, P. Forquin, and G. Rossiquet, Experimental and numerical analysis of the dynamic fragmentation in a SiC ceramic under impact, Int. J. Impact Eng., 76, 9–19 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J.-L. Zinszner, B. Erzar, P. Forquin, E. Buzaud. Dynamic fragmentation of an alumina ceramic subjected to shockless spalling: an experimental and numerical study. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 85, 112–127 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J.-L. Zinszner., B. Erzar, P. Forquin. Strain-rate sensitivity of the tensile strength of two silicon carbides: experimental evidence and micromechanical modelling. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 20160167 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Forquin, E. Ando. Application of microtomography and image analysis to the quantification of fragmentation in ceramics after impact loading. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 20160166, (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.