Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2019
23rd International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2018)
Article Number 06034
Number of page(s) 8
Section T6 - Machine learning & analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921406034
Published online 17 September 2019
  1. M. Baker, “1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility”, Nature 533, 452—454 (2016), doi:10.1038/533452a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. H. B. M. Gronenschild, P. Habets, H. I. L. Jacobs, R. Mengelers, N. Rozendaal, J. van Os, M. Marcelis, “The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements”, PLOS One (2012), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038234. [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Akopoff et al, “Status Report of the DPHEP Study Group: Towards a Global Effort for Sustainable Data Preservation in High Energy Physics” (2012), arXiv:1205.4667. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. D. Hildreth, A. Boehnlein, K. Cranmer, S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, R. Gardner, T. Hacker, L. Heinrich, I. Jimenez, M. Kane, D. S. Katz, T. Malik, C. Maltzahn, M. Neubauer, S. Neubert, J. Pivarski, E. Sexton-Kennedy, J. Shiers, T. Šimko, S. Smith, D. South, A. Verbytskyi, G. Watts, J. Wozniak, “HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group – Data and Software Preservation to Enable Reuse” (2018), arXiv:1810.01191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. X. Chen, S. Dallmeier-Tiessen, R. Dasler, S. Feger, P. Fokianos, J. B. Gonzalez, H. Hir-vonsalo, D. Kousidis, A. Lavasa, S. Mele, D. Rodriguez Rodriguez, T. Šimko, T. Smith, A. Trisovic, A. Trzcinska, I. Tsanaktsidis, M. Zimmermann, K. Cranmer, L. Heinrich, G. Watts, M. Hildreth, L. Lloret Iglesias, K. Lassila-Perini, S. Neubert, “Open is not enough”, Nature Physics (2018), doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0342-2. [Google Scholar]
  6. REANA reusable and reproducible analysis platform, http://www.reana.io/. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. M. P. van der Aalst, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, A. P. Bar-ros, “Workflow Patterns”, Distributed and Parallel Databases 14, 5–51 (2003), doi:10.1023/A:1022883727209. [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Amstutz, M. R. Crusoe, N. Tijanic´ (editors), B. Chapman, J. Chilton, M. Heuer, A. Kartashov, D. Leehr, H. Ménager, M. Nedeljkovich, M. Scales, S. Soiland-Reyes, L. Stojanovic, “Common Workflow Language, v1.0” Specification, Common Workflow Language working group (2016), doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.3115156.v2. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Cranmer, L. Heinrich, “Yadage and Packtivity –– analysis preservation using parametrized workflows” (2017), arXiv:1706.01878. [Google Scholar]
  10. REANA example, https://github.com/reanahub/reana-demo-atlas-recast. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Seuster, M. Elsing, G. A. Stewart and V. Tsulaia on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration, “Status and Future Evolution of the ATLAS Offline Software”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664 (2015) 072044. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/664/7/072044. [Google Scholar]
  12. ATLAS collaboration, “Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse momentum and multiple b-jets in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector” (2018), ATLAS-CONF-2018-041, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2632347. [Google Scholar]
  13. ATLAS collaboration, “Reinterpretation of searches for supersymmetry in models with variable R-parity-violating coupling strength and long-lived R-hadrons” (2018), ATLAS-CONF-2018-003, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/2308391. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.