Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2019
23rd International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2018)
Article Number 09004
Number of page(s) 9
Section PL - Plenary contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921409004
Published online 17 September 2019
  1. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV), https://hflav-eos.web.cern.ch/hflav-eos/semi/summer18/RDRDs.html (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Abe et al.(Belle II Collaboration), arXiv:1011.0352 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Tsaregorodtsev et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 119, 062048 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Santos and B. Koblitz, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 559, 53 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. https://cernvm.cern.ch/portal/filesystem (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Kuhr et al.(Belle II Framework Software Group), arXiv:1809.04299 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Brun and F. Rademakers, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 389, 81 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Wood et al., “Performance of the Belle II Conditions Database” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Hauth for the Belle II Tracking Group, “Belle II Track Reconstruction and Results from first Collisions” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Spataro for the Belle II Tracking Group, “Track Fitting for the Belle II Experiment” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Agostinelli et al.(GEANT4Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Rauch and T. Schluter, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 608, 012042 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. https://airflow.apache.org (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Bilka et al., “Alignment and Calibration of the Belle II Detector” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Blobel and C. Kleinwort, Proceedings of the Conference on Adcanced Statistical Techniques in Particle Physics (2002) [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Tenchini and J.-F. Krohn for the Belle II Software Group “Decay Chain Reconstruction at Belle II” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Abudinen, “The Belle II flavor tagger” in these proceedings (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Keck et al., arXiv:1807.08680 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. http://www.scons.org (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. https://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. http://buildbot.net (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. http://www.doxygen.nl (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. http://www.sphinx-doc.org (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. https://askbot.com (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.