Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020
ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04021
Number of page(s) 6
Section Research Reactors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202022504021
Published online 20 January 2020
  1. C Vaglio-Gaudard, A Santamarina, P Blaise, O Litaize, A Lyoussi, G Noguère, J. M. Ruggieri, and J. F. Vidal, ‘Interpretation of PERLE Experiment for the Validation of Iron Nuclear Data Using Monte Carlo Calculations’, Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 89–106, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Lamirand, G. Perret, S. Radman, D. Siefman, M. Hursin, P. Frajtag, A. Gruel, P. Leconte, P. Blaise, and A. Pautz, ‘Design of separated element reflector experiments in CROCUS: PETALE’, in International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry, 2017, p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Laureau, V. Lamirand, D. Rochman, and A. Pautz, ‘Total Monte Carlo acceleration for the PETALE experimental programme in the CROCUS reactor’, Accepted in WONDER 2018 – 5th edition of the International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor Applications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Lamirand, A. Laureau, D. Rochman, G. Perret, A. Gruel, P. Leconte, P. Blaise, and A. Pautz, ‘An Experimental Programme optimized with Uncertainty Propagation: PETALE in the CROCUS Reactor’, Accepted in WONDER 2018 - 5th edition of the International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor Applications, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. OECD/NEA, Benchmark on Kinetic Parameters in the CROCUS Reactor, 4440. 2007, vol. 9, p. 94. [Google Scholar]
  6. Canberra Industries, ‘GenieTM 2000 Spectroscopy Software Operations’, pp. 61–97, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. R Venkataraman, F Bronson, V Atrashkevich, M Field, and B. M. Young, ‘Improved Detector Response Characterization Method in ISOCS and LabSOCS 1 . General Philosophy of ISOCS Detector Characterization 2 . Response Characterization Methodologies’, vol. 264, no. Marc Vi, pp. 1–21, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. LeppXSänen, SERPENT– a Continuous-energy Monte Carlo Reactor Physics Burnup Calculation Code. 2015, p. 162. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. J. Siefman, G. Girardin, A. Rais, A. Pautz, and M. Hursin, ‘Full Core modeling techniques for research reactors with irregular geometries using Serpent and PARCS applied to the CROCUS reactor’ Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 85, pp. 434–443, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Reginatto, P. Goldhagen, and S. Neumann, ‘Spectrum unfolding, sensitivity analysis and propagation of uncertainties with the maximum entropy deconvolution code MAXED’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 476, no. 1–2, pp. 242–246, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Diamond and S. Boyd, ‘CVXPY: A Pythonembedded modeling language for convex optimization’, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 83, pp. 1–5, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. A Santamarina, D Bernard, P Blaise, M Coste, A Courcelle, T. D. Huynh, C Jouanne, P Leconte, O Litaize, S Mengelle, G Noguére, J. M. Ruggièri, O Sérot, J Tommasi, C Vaglio, J. F. Vidal, and Y Rugama, The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library, 22. 2009, pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Capote, K. Zolotarev, V. Pronyaev, and A. Trkov, ‘Updating and extending the irdf-2002 dosimetry library’, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Rochman, A. Koning, J. Sublet, M. Fleming, E. Bauge, S. Hilaire, P. Romain, B. Morillon, H. Duarte, S. Goriely, S. Van Der Marck, H. Sjöstrand, S. Pomp, N. DzysiGBR, O. Cabellos, H. FerroGBRhi, and A. Vasiliev, ‘The TENDL library: Hope, reality and future’, EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 146, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Berger, J. Hubbell, S. Seltzer, J. Chang, J. Coursey, R. Sukumar, D. Zucker, and K. Olsen. (). Nist standard reference database 8, Com: Photon cross sections database. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Tesinsky, C. Berglöf, T. Bäck, B. Martsynkevich, I. Serafimovich, V. Bournos, A. Khilmanovich, Y. Fokov, S. Korneev, H. Kiyavitskaya, and W. Gudowski, ‘Comparison of calculated and measured reaction rates obtained through foil activation in the subcritical dual spectrum facility YALINA-Booster’, Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 38, pp. 1412–1417, 2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.