EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 225, 2020ANIMMA 2019 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Section||Education, Training and Outreach|
|Published online||20 January 2020|
- Z. Elter, C. Jammes, I. P´azsit, L. P´al, and P. Filliatre, “Performance investigation of the pulse and campbelling modes of a fission chamber using a poisson pulse train simulation code,” NIMA, vol. 774, pp. 60–67, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Chabod, G. Fioni, A. Letourneau, and F. Marie, “Modelling of fission chambers in current mode–analytical approach,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 566, pp. 633–653, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. de Izarra, “Cosicaf software,” https://github.com/gdeIzarra/cosicaf, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- J. W. Eaton, D. Bateman, S. Hauberg, and R. Wehbring, GNU Octave version 4.4.1 manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v4.4.1/ [Google Scholar]
- P. Filliatre, C. Jammes, B. Geslot, and R. Veenhof, “A monte carlo simulation of the fission chambers neutron-induced pulse shape using the garfield suite,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 678, pp. 139–147, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Elter, “pyfc: a trim-based fission chamber pulse shape simulator,” CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, Tech. Rep., 2015. [Google Scholar]
- A. K. Chung and M. A. Prelas, “The transport of heavy charged particles in a cylindrical nuclear-pumped plasma,” Nuclear Science and engineering, vol. 86, pp. 267–274, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Y. Mat’ev, “Energy deposition by fission fragments in nuclear-pumped lasers: 1. a general method of calculation,” Technical Physics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Ziegler, J. Biersack, and M. Ziegler, SRIM - The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- J. Hajnrych, P. Filliatre, and B. Geslot, “Penetration of gases by fission fragments—comparison between selected models and the data,” NIMA, vol. 911, pp. 15–18, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. P. Biersack, “New projected range algorithm as derived from transport equations,” Z. Phys. A - Atoms and Nuclei, vol. 305, pp. 95–101, 1982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Nguyen and L. Grossman, “Ionisation by fission fragments escaping from a source medium,” Nuclear science and engineering, vol. 30, pp. 233–241, 1967. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Ziegler, M. Ziegler, and J. Biersack, “Srim–the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). nuclear instruments and methods,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 268, pp. 1818–1823, 2010. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ICRU report 31, average energy required to produce an ion pair, International Commissionon Radiation Units and Measurements, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- G. Raju, Gaseous Eectronics: theory and practice. Taylor and Francis, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- R. Goyatina and S. Maiorov, “Approximation of the characteristics of ion drift in parent gas,” Plasma Physics Reports, vol. 43, pp. 75–82, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. He, “Review of the Shockley–Ramo theorem and its application in semiconductor gamma-ray detectors,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 463, pp. 250–267, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Kakutani, “Two-dimensional brownian motion and harmonic functions,” Proc. Imp. Acad, vol. 20, pp. 706–714, 1944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Sadiky, Numerical techniques in electromagnetics, C.Press, Ed., 2001. [Google Scholar]
- A.A. Kruithof, “Townsend’s ionization coefficients for neon, argon, krypton and xenon,” Physica, vol. 7, pp. 519–540, 1940. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Filliatre and C. Jammes, “A comprehensive numerical modelling of a fission chamber to be operated over a wide dynamics in the vessel of a sodium-cooled reactor,” in Physor 2016 proceedings, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.