Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Reactor Concepts and Special Mission Reactors
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. D. E. Holcomb, G. F. Flanagan, B. W. Patton, J. C. Gehin, R. L. Howard, and T. J. Harrison, Fast Spectrum Molten Salt Reactor Options, no. July. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. W. Rosenthal, P. R. Kasten, and R. B. Briggs, “Molten-Salt Reactors — History , Status , and Potential,” Nucl. Appl. Technol., vol. 8, p. 107, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Serp et al., “The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: Overview and perspectives,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 77, pp. 308–319, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Ignatiev, “Developing the Next Generation of Molten Salt Reactor Systems in Russian Federation.” Kurchatov Institute, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Yoshioka and I. Thorium, “MSR-FUJI Design and MSR-related Activity in Japan,” pp. 1–61, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Zhimin, Z. Yang, and C. Kun, “Thorium Molten Salt Reactors (TMSR) Development in China.” [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Journ, “Helium bubbling in a Molten Salt Fast Reactor,” 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. P. Finkelstein and V. M. Lovell, “Fundamental studies of the flotation process: the work of the National Institute for Metallurgy,” J. South African Inst. Min. Metall., no. July, p. 15, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Delpech et al., “Reactor physic and reprocessing scheme for innovative molten salt reactor system,” J. Fluor. Chem., vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. L. Kloosterman, “Safety assessment of the molten salt fast reactor (SAMOFAR),” pp. 0–5, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Aufiero, A. Cammi, C. Fiorina, J. Leppänen, L. Luzzi, and M. E. Ricotti, “An extended version of the SERPENT-2 code to investigate fuel burn-up and core material evolution of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor,” J. Nucl. Mater., vol. 441, no. 1–3, pp. 473–486, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Aufiero et al., “Development of an OpenFOAM model for the Molten Salt Fast Reactor transient analysis,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 111, pp. 390–401, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Laureau, D. Heuer, P. R. Rubiolo, M. Allibert, and M. Aufiero, “Transient coupled calculations of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor using the Transient Fission Matrix approach,” vol. 316, pp. 112–124, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Leppänen, “Serpent - a continuous-energy {Monte Carlo} reactor physics burnup calculation code,” vol. 2014, no. 1/10, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Aufiero et al., “Calculating the effective delayed neutron fraction in the Molten Salt Fast Reactor : Analytical , deterministic and Monte Carlo approaches,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 65, pp. 78–90, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Rouch et al., “Preliminary thermal-hydraulic core design of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR),” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 64, pp. 449–456, 2014. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.