Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Reactor Concepts and Special Mission Reactors
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. Nonbøl, E. 1996. Description of the Advanced Gas Cooled Type of Reactor (AGR), Risø National Laboratory Report, NKS/RAK2(96)TR-C2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller, R. F. and R. L. Sindelar. 1995. Analysis for Materials Test Reactor (MTR Fuel Assemblies in Dry Storage), WSRC-TR-95–0121, Westinghouse Savannah River Company. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cammi, A. et al. 2016. “Characterization of the TRIGA Mark II reactor full-power steady state,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 300, 308–321. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pond, R. B. et al. 1998. “A Neutronic Feasibility Study for LEU Conversion of the Budapest Research Reactor,” Proceedings of the International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Sao Paulo, Brazil, October 18–23, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hanan, N. A. et al. 2006. “WWR-SM Conversion to LEU IRT-4M Oxide Fuel,” Proceedings of the International RERTR Meeting, Cape Town, South Africa, October 29–November 2, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stanley, C. J., and F. M. Marshall. 2008. “Advanced Test Reactor—A National Scientific User Facility,” Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Orlando, Florida, May 11–15, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. MIT. 2019. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Nuclear Reactor Laboratory: Reactor. Accessed 29 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Adamson, G. M. Jr., and R. W. Knight. 1968. HFIR Fuel Element Production and Operation, ORNLTM-2196, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  9. Stevens, J. G. 2010. Technical Challenges for Conversion of U.S. High-Performance Research Reactors, NAS/RAS Committee on Conversion of Research Reactors, 29 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. MU Research Reactor. 2019. University of Missouri. Accessed 29 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sobes, V. et al. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence Design of Nuclear Systems Empowered by Advanced Manufacturing,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2020, Cambridge, United Kingdom, March 29–April 2, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Betzler, B. R. et al. 2019. Advanced Manufacturing for Nuclear Core Design, ORNL/TM-2019/1258, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gandy, D., and G. Stover. 2018. “Advanced Manufacturing to Enable the Next Generation of Nuclear Plants,” Presentation at Molten Salt Reactor Workshop—Creating a Self-Sustaining Environment for MSR Success, October 3–4, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hehr, A. et al. 2016. “Five-axis ultrasonic additive manufacturing for nuclear component manufacture,” JOM 69:3, 485–490. doi:10.1007/s11837–016–2205–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Houts, M. G. et al. 2012. “Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Advanced Space Exploration,” Proceedings of Space Propulsion 2012, Bordeaux, France, May 7–10, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guinness World Records Limited. 2016. Guinness World Records 2016, “Largest solid 3D-printed item,” Guinness World Records, 29 August 2016. Accessed 29 July 29, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Post, B. K. et al. 2019. “Using Big Area Additive Manufacturing to directly manufacture a boat hull mould,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping 14:2, 123–129. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1532798 [Google Scholar]
  18. DeHoff, R. R. et al. 2013. “Case Study: Additive Manufacturing of Aerospace Brackets,” Advanced Materials and Processes 171:3, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Holshouser, C. et al. 2013. Out of Bounds Additive Manufacturing,” Advanced Materials and Processes 171:3, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  20. Simpson, J. et al. 2019. Considerations for Application of Additive Manufacturing to Nuclear Reactor Core Components, ORNL/TM-2019/1190, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  21. NEAC. 2017. Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee. Assessment of Missions and Requirements for a New US Test Reactor. Accessed 5 August, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ade, B. J. et al. 2020. “Candidate Core Designs for the Transformational Challenge Reactor,” Proceedings of PHYSOR 2020, Cambridge, United Kingdom, March 29–April 2, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nelson, A. T. 2019. Features that Further Performance Limits of Nuclear Fuel Fabrication: Opportunities for Additive Manufacturing of Nuclear Fuels. ORNL/SPR-2019/1183, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tobin, K., and S. Aumeier. 2018. Technologies to Reactors: Enabling Deployment of Nuclear Energy Systems, ORNL-SPR-2018/1025, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cetiner, S. M. and P. Ramuhalli. 2019. Transformational Challenge Reactor Autonomous Control System Framework and Key Enabling Technologies. ORNL/SPR-2019/1178, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. doi:10.2172/1530084. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chandler, D. et al. 2019. “Neutronic and thermal-hydraulic feasibility studies for High Flux Isotope Reactor conversion to low-enriched uranium silicide dispersion fuel,” Annals of Nuclear Energy 130, 277–292. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.