Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 02014
Number of page(s) 8
Section Core Analysis Methods
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124702014
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. CASMO5 User’s Manual, Studsvik Scandpower, Inc., SSP-07/431, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  2. SIMULATE5 User’s Manual, Studsvik Scandpower, Inc., SSP-10/438, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. MIT Benchmark for Evaluation And Validation of Reactor Simulations RELEASE rev. 2.0.2, MIT Computational Reactor Physics Group, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Bykov et al., “Solution of the BEAVRS Benchmark Using CASMO-5 / SIMULATE-5 Code Sequence, “Proc. PHYSOR2016, Sun Valley, ID, May 1-5, 2016, (2016). [DVD-ROM]. [Google Scholar]
  5. B. S. Collins et al., “Simulation of the BEAVRS Benchmark using VERA,” Proc. of M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, Apr. 16-20, 2017, (2017). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Lee et al., “Preliminary Simulation Results of BEAVRS Three-dimensional Cycle 1 Wholecore Depletion by UNIST Monte Carlo Code MCS,” Proc. of M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, Apr. 16-20, 2017, (2017). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Gunow et al., “Accuracy and Performance of 3D MOC for Full-Core PWR Problem,” Proc. of M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, Apr. 16-20, 2017, (2017). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Suzuki et al., “Analysis of BEAVRS Revision 2.0 LWR Whole Core Calculation Using MVP with JENDL-4.0,” Proc. of M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, Apr. 16-20, 2017, (2017). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Zilly et al., “Analyzing the BEAVRS HZP Case with KMACS Using 2-group Data from SCALE-NEWT, HELIOS and nTRANCER,” Proc. of M&C2017, Jeju, Korea, Apr. 16-20, 2017, (2017). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. O. Grady et al., “Analysis of the BEAVRS Benchmark Using the TRITON/PARCS/PATHS Two-Step Sequence,” Proc. PHYSOR2018, Cancun, Mexico, Apr. 22-26, 2018, (2018). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Liponi et al., “Analysis of the MIT BEAVRS Benchmark Cycle 1 Using the DRAGON5/PARCS Code Sequence,” Proc. PHYSOR2018, Cancun, Mexico, Apr. 22-26, 2018, (2018). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Wan et al., “Uncertainty Analysis for the Core Simulation of Cycle 1 of the BEAVRS Benchmark Problem,” Proc. BEPU2018, Lucca, Italy, May 13-19, 2018 (2018). [USB]. [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Shibata et al., “JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering,” J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.. 48(1), pp. 1-30, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. M. B. Chadwick et al., “ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: Cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data,” Nucl. Data Sheets, 112(12), pp. 2887-2996, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Rhodes et al., “CASMO5 JENDL-4.0 and ENDF/B-VII.1beta4 libraries,” Proc. of PHYSOR2012, Knoxville, TN, Apr. 15-20, 2012, (2012). [CD-ROM]. [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Forget, Integral Full Core Multi-Physics PWR Benchmark with Measured Data, FY 2014 R&D Final Project Reports (NEUP Project 14-6742), Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP), U. S. Department of Energy, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Kerdraon et al., “ANDROMEDE calculations on BEAVRS benchmark (GABv2 / COCAGNE),” Proc. ICAPP2019, Juan-les-pins, France, May 12-15, 2019, (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.