Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 247, 2021
PHYSOR2020 – International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Transition to a Scalable Nuclear Future
Article Number 02015
Number of page(s) 8
Section Core Analysis Methods
Published online 22 February 2021
  1. (German) Reactor Safety Commission (RSK). “PWR neutron flux oscillations.” SK Statement (457th meeting on 11042013) (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Verdú, M. García-Fenoll, A. Abarca, R. Miró, and T. Barrachina. “Study of the noise propagation in PWR with coupled codes.” In International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Design (M & C 2011). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, Mayo 8-12 2011. American Nuclear Society (ANS) (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Seidl, K. Kosowski, U. Schüler, and L. Belblidia. “Review of the historic neutron noise behavior in German KWU built PWRs.” Progress in Nuclear Energy, volume 85, pp. 668 – 675 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Bermejo, C. Montalvo, and A. Ortego. “On the possible effects contributing to neutron noise variations in KWU-PWR reactor: Modelling with S3K.” Progress in Nuclear Energy, volume 95, pp. 1 – 7 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Viebach, C. Lange, N. Bernt, M. Seidl, D. Hennig, and A. Hurtado. “Simulation of low-frequency PWR neutron flux fluctuations.” Progress in Nuclear Energy, volume 117, p. 103039 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Chionis, A. Dokhane, H. Ferroukhi, G. Girardin, and A. Pautz. “PWR NEUTRON NOISE PHENOMENOLOGY: PART II QUALITATIVE COMPARISON AGAINST PLANT DATA.” In PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics paving the way towards more efficient systems, Cancun, Mexico, April 22-26, 2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. U. Rohde, S. Kliem, U. Grundmann, S. Baier, Y. Bilodid, S. Duerigen, E. Fridman, A. Gommlich, A. Grahn, L. Holt, Y. Kozmenkov, and S. Mittag. “The reactor dynamics code DYN3D models, validation and applications.” Progress in Nuclear Energy, volume 89, pp. 170 – 190 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Wanninger, M. Seidl, and R. Maciáan-Juan. “Mechanical analysis of the bow deforma an-Juan. tion of a row of fuel assemblies in a PWR core.” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, volume 50(2), pp. 297 – 305 (2018). Special issue on the water reactor fuel performance meeting 2017 (WRFPM 2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. Studsvik Scandpower, Inc. “CASMO5. A FUEL ASSEMBLY BURNUP PROGRAM.” [Google Scholar]
  10. The MathWorks Inc., Natick. MATLAB R2016b (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Runkel. Rauschanalyse in Druckwasserreaktoren. Ph.D. thesis, Universitt Hannover (1987). [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Stegemann and J. Runkel. “Experience with Vibration Monitoring in German PWRs Obrigheim, Grohnde, Brokdorf and Emsland.” In SMORN VII. A SYMPOSIUM ON NUCLEAR REACTOR SURVEILLANCE AND DIAGNOSTICS, Avignon, France, 19-23 June 1995, volume 1, pp. 23–31 (1996). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.