Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
Article Number 02058
Number of page(s) 6
Section Distributed Computing, Data Management and Facilities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125102058
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. E Karavakis et al., “FTS improvements for LHC Run-3 and beyond“, 2020 EPJ Web of Conferences 245, 04009 doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202024504016 [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Evans and P. Bryant, LHC Machine, JINST 3 S08001 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. I Bird, Computing for the Large Hadron Collider, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 61 :99-118 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Barisits, T. Beermann, F. Berghaus et al., Rucio: Scientific Data Management, Comput Softw Big Sci 3: 11 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. S K Paterson and A Tsaregorodtsev, DIRAC optimized workload management, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119 062040 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Kiryanov, A. A. Ayllon and O. Keeble, FTS3 / WebFTS – A Powerful File Transfer Service for Scientific Communities, Procedia Computer Science 66 670-678 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. E Karavakis et al., “Unified Monitoring Architecture for IT and Grid Services”, 2017 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 898 092033 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/898/9/092033 [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Bernabeu et al., Experiences with http/WebDAV protocols for data access in high throughput computing, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 072003 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Allcock et al., The Globus Striped GridFTP Framework and Server, SC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, Seattle, WA, USA, 2005, pp. 54-54, doi: 10.1109/SC.2005.72 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Dorigo et al., XROOTD - a highly scalable architecture for data access, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 4(4):348--353 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Abadie et al., Storage Resource Managers: Recent International Experience on Requirements and Multiple Co-Operating Implementations, 24th IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST 2007), San Diego, CA, 2007, pp. 47-59, doi: 10.1109/MSST.2007.4367963 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. J. Peters and L. Janyst, Exabyte Scale Storage at CERN, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 331 052015 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Alvarez et al., DPM: Future Proof Storage, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 396 032015 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Carbone et al., Performance Studies of the StoRM Storage Resource Manager, Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science 2007), Bangalore, pp. 423-430 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Fuhrmann and V. Gülzow, dCache, Storage System for the Future, Euro-Par 2006 Parallel Processing. Euro-Par 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4128 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. G Lo Presti et al., CASTOR: A Distributed Storage Resource Facility for High Performance Data Processing at CERN, 24th IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST 2007), San Diego, CA, 2007, pp. 275-280 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Cano et al., CERN Tape Archive: production status, migration from CASTOR and new features, EPJ Web Conf. Volume 245, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024504013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gardner, R., Breen, J., Bryant, L., & McKee, S., SLATE and the Mobility of Capability, Science Gateways 2017 [Google Scholar]
  19. Souppaya, M., Morello, J., & Scarfone, K. (2017). Application container security guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-190 [Google Scholar]
  20. OKD: http://www.okd.io [Google Scholar]
  21. JWT: https://jwt.io/ [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Basney, Jim, T. Fleury, J. Gaynor, (2013). CILogon: a federated X.509 certification authority for CyberInfrastructure logon. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience. https://doi.org/10.1145/2484762.2484791 [Google Scholar]
  23. WLCG IAM: https://indigo-iam.github.io/wlcg-docs/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.