Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2021
25th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2021)
Article Number 03038
Number of page(s) 11
Section Offline Computing
Published online 23 August 2021
  1. D. Heck, J. Knapp, J. N. Capdevielle, G. Schatz, and T. Thouw, CORSIKA: A Monte Carlo code to simulate extensive air showers, Tech. Rep. FZKA-6019 (Forschungszen-trum Karlsruhe, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  2. H. J. Gils, D. Heck, J. Oehlschlaeger, G. Schatz, T. Thouw, and A. Merkel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 56, 105 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Engel, D. Heck, T. Huege, T. Pierog, M. Reininghaus, F. Riehn, R. Ulrich, M. Unger, and D. Veberic, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3, 2 (2019), arXiv:1808.08226 [astro-ph.IM]. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Hoberock et al., A Unified Executors Proposal for C++, Tech. Rep. P0443R11 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Dos Reis, M. Hall, and G. Nishano, A Module System for C++ (Revision 2), Tech. Rep. N4214 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. B. Migdal, Phys. Rev. 103, 1811 (1956). [Google Scholar]
  7. L. D. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 92, 735 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  8. L. D. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 92, 535 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Smida et al., EPJ Web Conf. 53, 08010 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Reininghaus and R. Ulrich, EPJ Web Conf. 210, 02011 (2019), arXiv:1902.02822 [astro-ph.IM]. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. P. Dembinski, L. Nellen, M. Reininghaus, and R. Ulrich (CORSIKA 8), PoS ICRC2019, 236 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. M. Hillas, in Proc. 17th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf. (1981) p. 193. [Google Scholar]
  13. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Arrabito, K. Bernlöhr, J. Bregeon, M. Carrère, A. Khattabi, P. Langlois, D. Parello, and G. Revy, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4, 9 (2020), arXiv:2006.14927 [astro-ph.IM]. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Baack and W. Rhode, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1690, 012073 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Heck and R. Engel, The EHISTORY Option of the Air-Shower Simulation Program CORSIKA, Tech. Rep. FZKA-7495 (Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  17. S.J. Sciutto, (1999), 10.13140/RG.2.2.12566.40002, arXiv:astro-ph/9911331. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Meurer, J. Bluemer, R. Engel, A. Haungs, and M. Roth, Czech. J. Phys. 56, A211 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0512536 [astro-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  19. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. P. Dembinski, J. Pivarski, and H. Schreiner, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 05014 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  21. C. R. Harris et al., Nature 585, 357 (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 [cs.MS]. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063002 (2020), arXiv:1912.03300 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014018 (2011), arXiv:1010.1869 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015), arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Bleicher et al., J. Phys. G 25, 1859 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9909407. [Google Scholar]
  26. J.-M. Alameddine, J. Soedingrekso, A. Sandrock, M. Sackel, and W. Rhode, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1690, 012021 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Dunsch, J. Soedingrekso, A. Sandrock, M. Meier, T. Menne, and W. Rhode, Comput. Phys. Commun. 242, 132 (2019), arXiv:1809.07740 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  28. J. H. Koehne, K. Frantzen, M. Schmitz, T. Fuchs, W. Rhode, D. Chirkin, and J. Becker Tjus, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 2070 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Wenzel, J. Apostolakis, and G. Cosmo, EPJ Web Conf. 245, 02024 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Bergmann, R. Engel, D. Heck, N. N. Kalmykov, S. Ostapchenko, T. Pierog, T. Thouw, and K. Werner, Astropart. Phys. 26, 420 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0606564 [astro-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Melo, M. Reininghaus, F. Riehn, and R. Ulrich (CORSIKA 8), PoS ICRC2019, 399 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  33. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.