EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 252 (2021) EPJ Web Conf., 252 (2021) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 252, 2021
HINPw6 – Hellenic Institute of Nuclear Physics; 6th International Workshop; Perspectives on Nuclear Physics; From Fundamentals to Applications
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 5
Section Nuclear Structure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202125202005
Published online 10 September 2021
  1. H. Morinaga, Phys. Rev. 101, 254 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Heyde, J.L. Wood, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1467 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Himpe, G. Neyens, D. Balabanski, G. Belier, J. Daugas, F. de Oliveira Santos, M.D. Rydt, K. Flanagan, I. Matea, P. Morel et al., Phys. Lett. B 658, 203 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Kowalska, D.T. Yordanov, K. Blaum, P. Himpe, P. Lievens, S. Mallion, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, N. Vermeulen, Phys. Rev. C 77, 034307 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Neyens, M. Kowalska, D. Yordanov, K. Blaum, P. Himpe, P. Lievens, S. Mallion, R. Neugart, N. Vermeulen, Y. Utsuno et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 022501 (2005) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Schwerdtfeger, P.G. Thirolf, K. Wimmer, D. Habs, H. Mach, T.R. Rodriguez, V. Bildstein, J.L. Egido, L.M. Fraile, R. Gernhauser et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 012501 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Wimmer, T. Kröll, R. Krucken, V. Bildstein, R. Gernhauser, B. Bastin, N. Bree, J. Diriken, P. Van Duppen, M. Huyse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252501 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. M.G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 74, 235 (1948) [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Haxel, J.H.D. Jensen, H.E. Suess, Physical Review 75, 1766 (1949) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Poves, Shape Coexistence and Islands of Inversion Monopole vs Multipole, in Proceedings of the Ito International Research Center Symposium “Perspectives of the Physics of Nuclear Structure” (Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. B.A. Brown, Physics 3, 104 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Nowacki, A. Poves, J. Phys.: Conference Series 966, 012023 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, Phys. Rev. C 90, 014302(2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Sorlin, M.G. Porquet, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 602 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Martinou, D. Bonatsos, T.J. Mertzimekis, K.E. Karakatsanis, I.E. Assimakis, S.K. Peroulis, S. Sarantopoulou, N. Minkov, European Physical Journal A 57, 84 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Federman, S. Pittel, Phys. Lett. B 69, 385 (1977) [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Federman, S. Pittel, Physics Letters B 77, 29 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Federman, S. Pittel, Phys. Rev. C 20, 820 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Heyde, P.V. Isacker, R. Casten, J. Wood, Phys. Lett. B 155, 303 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.P. Elliott, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 245, 128 (1958) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.P. Elliott, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 245, 562 (1958) [Google Scholar]
  22. J.P. Elliott, M. Harvey, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 272, 557 (1963) [Google Scholar]
  23. J.P. Elliott, C.E. Wilsdon, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 302, 509 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Bonatsos, I.E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Marti- nou, R.B. Cakirli, R.F. Casten, K. Blaum, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Bonatsos, I.E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R.B. Cakirli, R.F. Casten, K. Blaum, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Bonatsos, European Physical Journal A 53, 148 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Martinou, D. Bonatsos, N. Minkov, I.E. Assi- makis, S.K. Peroulis, S. Sarantopoulou, J. Cseh, European Physical Journal A 56, 239 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Martinou, D. Bonatsos, K.E. Karakatsanis, S. Sarantopoulou, I.E. Assimakis, S.K. Peroulis, N. Minkov, European Physical Journal A 57, 83 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. H.J. Lipkin, Lie groups for pedestrians (Dover, New York, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Draayer, K.J. Weeks, Ann. Phys. 156,41 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  31. J.P. Draayer, Algebraic approaches to nuclear structure: Interacting boson and fermion models (Harwood Academic Publishers, New York, United States, 1993), Vol. 6 of Contemporary Concepts in Physics, chap. 7, pp. 423-546, ISBN 3-7186-0538-4 [Google Scholar]
  32. P.O. Lipas, Algebraic approaches to nuclear structure: interacting boson and fermion models (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1993), Vol. 6 of Contemporary Concepts in Physics, chap. 2, pp. 47-12 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vol. II (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  34. O. Castanos, J.P. Draayer, Y. Leschber, Zeitschrift fur Physik A Atomic Nuclei 329, 33 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  35. D.J. Rowe, G. Thiamova, J.L. Wood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 202501 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  36. D. Bonatsos, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, I.E. Assimakis, S.K. Peroulis, N. Minkov, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 2367 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Hirayama, T. Shimoda, H. Izumi, H. Yano, M. Yagi, A. Hatakeyama, C. Levy, K. Jackson, H.Miyatake, Nucl. Phys. A 746, 71 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Cappuzzello, A. Cunsolo, S. Fortier, A. Foti, M. Khaled, H. Laurent, H. Lenske, J. Maison, A. Melita, C. Nociforo et al., Phys. Lett. B 516, 21 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  39. J.L. Wood, K. Heyde, W. Nazarewicz, M. Huyse, P.V. Duppen, Phys. Rep. 215, 101 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  40. F. Flavigny, P. Doornenbal, A. Obertelli, J.P. De- laroche, M. Girod, J. Libert, T. Rodriguez, G. Au- thelet, H. Baba, D. Calvet et al., Physical Review Letters 118 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Thirolf, D. Habs, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 49, 325 (2002) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.