Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 253, 2021
ANIMMA 2021 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Fundamental Physics
Published online 19 November 2021
  1. Yu. G. Sobolev et al., “A setup for measuring total cross sections of nuclear reactions”, Instruments and Experimental Techniques 55 (2012) pp. 618. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. S. Fomichev et al., “Studies of light exotic nuclei in the vicinity of neutron and proton drip lines at FLNR JINR”, Phys.-Usp. 59 (2016) pp. 321. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu. G. Sobolev et al., “Studying the excitation function of the full cross section of a reaction using a modified transmission technique: Initial results”, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics 76 (2012) pp. 952. [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Sivacek et al., “Response function investigation of 4π γ-spectrometer “MULTI” by Geant4 Monte Carlo code”, Proceedings of the International symposium on Exotic Nuclei: EXON 2016, Kazan, Russia, World Scientific, ISBN 9789813226531, pp. 356. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yu. G. Sobolev et al., “Active collimators in experiments with exotic nuclear beams”, Instruments and Experimental Techniques 54 (2011) pp. 449. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu. G. Sobolev et al., “Measuring the Total Cross Sections for Reactions in Collisions of 6, 8He + 28Si and 9Li+ 28Si”, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Physics 83 (2019) pp. 402. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yu. G. Sobolev et al., “Total Reaction Cross Sections for 6, 8He and 9Li Nuclei on 28Si, 59Co, and 181Ta Targets”, Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Physics 84 (2020) pp. 948. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu. E. Penionzhkevich et al., “Energy dependence of the total cross section for the 11Li + 28Si Reaction”, Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 014609. [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Sivacek et al., “MULTI-2, a 4π spectrometer for total reaction cross section measurements”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 976 (2020) 164255. [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Sivacek et al., “Upgrade possibilities of the spectrometer MULTI”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Exotic Nuclei EXON 2018, World Scientific, ISBN 9811209448, pp. 444. [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Kamynski et al., “Status of the new fragment separator ACCULINNA-2 and first experiments”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 463 (2020) pp. 507. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Testov et al., “The 3He long-counter TETRA at the ALTO ISOL facility”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 815 (2016) pp. 96. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Testov et al., “Pygmy Gamow-Teller resonance in the N=50 region: New evidence from staggering of β-delayed neutron-emission probabilities”, Phys. Rev. C. 95 (2017) 054320. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. P. Severyukhin et al., “Pygmy dipole resonance of 134Sn”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Exotic Nuclei EXON 2018, World Scientific, ISBN 9811209448, pp. 341. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Agostinelli, et al., “Geant4 – a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506 (2003) pp. 250. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Allison, et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) pp. 270–278. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Allison, et al., Recent developments in Geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 835 (2016) pp. 186–225. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Camera, A. Maj, PARIS White Book, Published by the Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2021, ISBN 978-83-63542-22-1 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Dakowski et al., “Reconstruction of particle multiplicity distributions using the method of statistical regularization”, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 113 (1973) pp. 195. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.