Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 269, 2022
EFM19 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2019
Article Number 01041
Number of page(s) 5
Section Contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202226901041
Published online 24 October 2022
  1. T. Okamura, K. Kamemoto, J. Matsui, CFD prediction and model experiment on suction vortices in pump sump, Proc. 9th Asian Int. Conf. on Fluid Machinery (2007) 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  2. S.N. Shukla, J.T. Kshirsagar, Numerical prediction of air entrainment in pump intakes, Proc. 24th Int. Pump Users Symposium (2008) 29-33. [Google Scholar]
  3. A.C. Bayeul-Lainé, G. Bois, A. Issa, Numerical simulation of flow field in water-pump sump and inlet suction pipe, Proc. 25th IAHR Symp. on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems (2010) 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. C.G. Kim, B.H. Kim, B.H. Bang, Y.H. Lee, Experimental and CFD analysis for prediction of vortex and swirl angle in the pump sump station model, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 72 (2015) 042044, doi:10.1088/1757-99X/72/4/0420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. F. Gülich, Centrifugal pumps, 3rd edition. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, xli, p. 1116. ISBN 978-3-642-40113-8. [Google Scholar]
  6. ANSYS, Inc., ANSYS CFD Documentation, Release 2019R3 (2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.