Open Access
| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 269, 2022
EFM19 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2019
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01042 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Contributions | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202226901042 | |
| Published online | 24 October 2022 | |
- B. Bjerg et al., “Review Modelling of ammonia emissions from naturally ventilated livestock buildings. Part 1 : Ammonia release modelling,” Biosyst. Eng., vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 232–245, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Arogo, R. H. Zhang, G. L. Riskowski, and D. L. Day, “Mass transfer coefficient for hydogen sulfide emission from aqueous solutions and liquid swine manure,” Trans. ASABE, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1455–1462, 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Rong, P. V. Nielsen, and G. Zhang, “Effects of airflow and liquid temperature on ammonia mass transfer above an emission surface: Experimental study on emission rate,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 100, no. 20, pp. 4654–4661, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Olesen and S. Sommer, “Modeling effects of wind-speed and surface cover on ammonia volatilization from stored pig slurry,” Atmos. Environ. Part a-General Top., vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2567–2574, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. De Paepe, J. G. Pieters, L. B. Mendes, S. Van Weyenberg, B. Merci, and P. Demeyer, “Wind tunnel study of ammonia transfer from a manure pit fitted with a dairy cattle slatted floor,” Environ. Technol. (United Kingdom), vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 202–215, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Choiniere, F. Blais, and J. Munroe, “A wind tunnel study of airflow patterns in a naturally ventilated building,” Can. Agri. Eng, pp. 293–297, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- S. Morsing, A. Ikeguchi, J. C. Bennetsen, J. S. Strøm, P.Ravn, and L. Okushima, “Wind induced isothermal airflow patterns in a scale model of a naturally ventilated swine barn with cathedral ceiling,” Appl. Eng. Agric., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 97–101, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. De Paepe, J. G. Pieters, W. M. Cornelis, D. Gabriels, B. Merci, and P. Demeyer, “Airflow measurements in and around scale model cattle barns in a wind tunnel: Effect of ventilation opening height,” Biosyst. Eng., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Q. Yi et al., “Wind tunnel investigations of sidewall opening effects on indoor airflows of a cross-ventilated dairy building,” Energy Build., vol. 175, pp. 163–172, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. E. Cermak, M. Poreh, J. A. Peterka, and S. S. Ayad, “Wind tunnel investigations of natural ventilation,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. J. Cook, “On simulating the lower third of the urban adiabatic boundary layer in a wind tunnel,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 691–705, 1973. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Uruba, “Near wake dynamics around a vibrating airfoil by means of PIV and Oscillation Pattern Decomposition at Reynolds number,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 55, pp. 372–383, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Shen, R. Su, G. K. Ntinas, and G. Zhang, “Influence of sidewall openings on air change rate and airflow conditions inside and outside low-rise naturally ventilated buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 130, pp. 453–464, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Hasselmann, “PIPs and POPs: The Reduction of Complex Dynamical Systems Using Principal Interaction and Oscillation Patterns,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 93, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- V. Uruba, “Decomposition methods in turbulence research,” in EPJ Web of Conferences, 2012, vol. 25. [Google Scholar]
- V. Uruba and P. Procházka, “On interpretation of spatiotemporal data decomposition,” in 15th International Conference on Fluid Control, Measurements and Visualization, 2019, no. May, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- V. Uruba, “Energy and Entropy in Turbulence Decompositions,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.