EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 270 (2022) EPJ Web Conf., 270 (2022) 00009 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 270, 2022
QCD@Work 2022 - International Workshop on Quantum Chromodynamics - Theory and Experiment
Article Number 00009
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202227000009
Published online 17 November 2022
  1. J. Albrecht, D. van Dyk and C. Langenbruch, “Flavour anomalies in heavy quark decays,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103885 (2021) [arXiv:2107.04822 [hep-ex]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Bryman, V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin and G. Inguglia, “Testing Lepton Flavor Universality with Pion, Kaon, Tau, and Beta Decays,” [arXiv:2111.05338 [hep-ph]] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, “Radiative corrections to pi(lepton 2) decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), 3629–3632 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Decker and M. Finkemeier, “Radiative corrections to the decay tau ! pi (K) tauneutrino,” Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993), 403–406 [arXiv:hep-ph/9307372 [hep-ph]]; “Radiative corrections to the decay tau ! pi (K) tau-neutrino. 2,” Phys. Lett. B 334 (1994), 199-202; “Short and long distance effects in the decay tau ! pi tau-neutrino (gamma),” Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 17-53 [arXiv:hep-ph/9403385 [hep-ph]]; “Radiative corrections to the decay tau ! pi tau-neutrino,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 40 (1995), 453-461 [arXiv:hep-ph/9411316 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, G. Hernández-Tomé, G. López-Castro, P. Roig and I. Rosell, “Radiative corrections to: a reliable new physics test,” Phys.Rev.D 104 (2021) 9, L091502 [arXiv:2107.04603 [hep-ph]]; “One-loop determination of t ! Æ(Æ)vT[y] branching ratios and new physics tests,” JHEP 02 (2022), 173 [arXiv:2112.01859 [hep- ph]] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. S. Amhis et al. [HFLAV], “Averages of ŵ-hadron, c-hadron, and T-lepton properties as of 2018,” Eur.Phys.J.C 81 (2021) 3, 226, [arXiv:1909.12524 [hep-ex]] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Test of the universality of t and p lepton couplings in W-boson decays with the ATLAS detector,” Nature Phys. 17 (2021) no. 7, 813–818 [arXiv:2007.14040 [hep-ex]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. CMS Collaboration, “A precision measurement of the W boson decay branching fractions in pp collisions at p = 13 TeV,” CMS-PAS-SMP-18-011 [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, “The Role of Resonances in Chiral Perturbation Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989), 311–342; [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, “Chiral Lagrangians for Massive Spin 1 Fields,” Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989), 425–432; [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemüller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portolés, “Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants,” Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006), 139177 [arXiv:hep-ph/0603205 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Amhis et al. [HFLAV], “Averages of ŵ-hadron, c-hadron, and T-lepton properties as of 2021,” [arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex]] [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Cirigliano and I. Roseli, “Two-loop effective theory analysis of pi (K) ! e anti-nu/e [gamma] branching ratios,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007), 231801 [arXiv:0707.3439 [hep- ph]]; “pi/K ! e anti-nu(e) branching ratios to O(e2 p4) in Chiral Perturbation Theory,” JHEP 10 (2007), 005 [arXiv:0707.4464 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Kinoshita, “Radiative corrections to pi - e decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959), 477 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. H. Guo and P. Roig, “One meson radiative tau decays,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010), 113016 [arXiv:1009.2542 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Y. Seng, D. Galviz, W. J. Marciano and U. G. Meißner, “An update on from semileptonic kaon and pion decays,” [arXiv:2107.14708 [hep-ph]] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Cirigliano, A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, “Hadronic t Decays as New Physics Probes in the LHC Era,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no. 22, 221801 [arXiv:1809.01161 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Gonzàlez-Solís, A. Miranda, J. Rendón and P. Roig, “Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020), 135371 [arXiv:1912.08725 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. V. Cirigliano, D. Díaz-Calderón, A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, “Semileptonic tau decays beyond the Standard Model,” JHEP 04 (2022), 152 [arXiv:2112.02087 [hep-ph]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. A. Zyla et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of Particle Physics,” PTEP 2020 (2020) no. 8, 083C01 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, “Superallowed 0+ ! 0+ nuclear ß decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for V„d and CKM unitarity,” Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) no. 4, 045501 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Aoki et al. [Flavour Lattice Averaging Group], “FLAG Review 2019: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG),” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no. 2, 113 [arXiv:1902.08191 [hep- lat]] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.