Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 288, 2023
ANIMMA 2023 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 04018
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research Reactors and Particle Accelerators
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328804018
Published online 21 November 2023
  1. V. LAMIRAND et al., “An Experimental Programme optimized with Uncertainty Propagation: PETALE in the CROCUS Reactor, ” EPJ Web Conf. 211, O. Serot and A. Chebboubi, Eds., 03003 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921103003. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. LIGONNET, Ed., Preliminary analysis of the PETALE program and comparison to simulations (2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. V. LAMIRAND et al., Future experimental programmes in the CROCUS reactor (2016); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2309.6728. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. K. FOELL, “Small-sample reactivity measurements in nuclear reactors, ” TID-26511, American Nuclear Society, Hinsdale, IL (1972). [Google Scholar]
  5. B. A. BAKER, “Comparison of open loop and closed loop reactivity measurement techniques on the ISU-AGN-201 reactor, ” Ph.D., Idaho State University (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. LECONTE et al., “MAESTRO: An ambitious experimental programme for the improvement of nuclear data of structural, detection, moderating and absorbing materials First results for natV, 55Mn, 59Co and 103Rh, ” in 2013 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation, Measurement Methods and their Applications (ANIMMA), pp. 1–9 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1109/ANIMMA.2013.6728101. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. GESLOT et al., “Innovative Hybrid Pile Oscillator Technique in the Minerve Reactor: Open Loop Versus Closed Loop, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 65 11, 2767 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2018.2874690. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. “A hybrid pile oscillator experiment in the Minerve reactor | Elsevier Enhanced Reader;” ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.036; (current as of Dec. 15, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. RAIS, “Performance assessment of a 3-D steady-state and spatial kinetics model for the CROCUS reactor, ” EPFL (2018); https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-8248. [Google Scholar]
  10. V. LAMIRAND et al., “Experimental report of the 3rd campaign at AKR2 and CROCUS, ” Public Deliverables 2.4, CORTEX, p. 38 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  11. V. LAMIRAND et al., “ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST COLIBRI FUEL RODS OSCILLATION CAMPAIGN IN THE CROCUS REACTOR FOR THE EUROPEAN PROJECT CORTEX, ” EPJ Web Conf. 247, 21010, EDP Sciences (2021); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124721010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. U. KASEMEYER et al., “Benchmark on Kinetic Parameters in the CROCUS Reactor, ” 978-92-64-99020-3, Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), p. 93 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. V. LAMIRAND et al., Eds., “Power calibration methodology at the CROCUS reactor, ” Adv. Nucl. Instrum. Meas. Methods Their Appl. Animma 2019, EDP SCIENCES, Cedex A (2020); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202022504022. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. VITULLO, “Miniature and Minimalistic Neutron Detectors for Online High-Resolution Experiments in the Zero-Power Reactor CROCUS, ” EPFL (2022); https://doi.org/10.5075/epfl-thesis-9492. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. LAUREAU et al., “Bayesian Monte Carlo assimilation for the PETALE experimental programme using inter-dosimeter correlation, ” EPJ Web Conf. 239, 18004, EDP Sciences (2020); https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023918004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. VITULLO et al., “A mm3 Fiber-Coupled Scintillator for In-Core Thermal Neutron Detection in CROCUS, ” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 67 4, 625 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2020.2977530. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. OOMS, tesseract: Open Source OCR Engine (2023). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.