Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 294, 2024
WONDER-2023 - 6th International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Processing and Benchmarking
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429406004
Published online 17 April 2024
  1. R. E. Stoller, in Compr. Nucl. Mater. Second Ed., edited by R. J. M. Konings and R. E. Stoller (Elsevier, Oxford, 2020), pp. 456–467. [Google Scholar]
  2. F. A. Garner, in Compr. Nucl. Mater. Second Ed., edited by R. J. M. Konings and R. E. Stoller (Elsevier, Oxford, 2020), pp. 57–168. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. E. MacFarlane and A. C. Kahler, Nucl. Data Sheets 111, 2739 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Chen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 513, 1 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Chen and D. Bernard, J. Nucl. Mater. 562, 153610 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Chen, Nucl. Mater. Energy 33, 101284 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Chen, Y. Peneliau, and D. Bernard, Fusion Eng. Des. 171, 112594 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Bernard, Estimation of Bias and Uncertainties for Radiation Damage Calculation (Fission Reactors) (IAEA INDC International Nuclear Data Committee, 2016), pp. 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Chen and C. Yuan, Nucl. Phys. Rev. 40, 303 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Chen et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 456, 120 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Chen et al., Nucl. Mater. Energy 28, 101017 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Lindhard et al., Mat.-Fys. Meddelelser Konglige Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. 33, 1 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. J. Norgett, M. T. Robinson, and I. M. Torrens, Nucl. Eng. Des. 33, 50 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Nordlund et al., Primary Radiation Damage in Materials (OECD/NEA, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Nordlund et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 1084 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Chen, J. Nucl. Mater. 568, 153883 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. J. Zinkle and R. E. Stoller, J. Nucl. Mater. 577, 154292 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. T. Robinson, in Nucl. Fusion React. (British Nuclear Energy Society, 1970), pp. 364–378. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Chen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 536, 104 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Konno et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 109111, 1649 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Konno et al., EPJ Web Conf. 146, 02040 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Zu et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 123, 153 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W. Yin et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 164, 108624 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Chen, Results Phys. 51, 106781 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. J. M. Plompen et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 181 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. A. Brown et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. https://www-nds.iaea.org/INDEN/ [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Brun et al., Ann. Nucl. Energy 82, 151 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Sato et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 55, 684 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Iwamoto et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 51, 98 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Chen et al., Results Phys. 17, 103023 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  32. O. Litaize, O. Serot, and L. Berge, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 177 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Chalil et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 30 (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Chen, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 508, 41 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Santamarina et al., The JEFF-3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library (OECD/NEA, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Shibata et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. O. Iwamoto et al., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 60, 1 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.