Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 301, 2024
XLV Symposium on Nuclear Physics 2024
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Hadronic Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430103004
Published online 07 August 2024
  1. F. Sauter, Z. Phys. 69 (1931) 742. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98 (1936) 714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Abramowicz et al., “Letter of Intent for the LUXE Experiment”, arXiv:1909.00860 [physics.ins-det]. [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Yakimenko et al., “FACET-II facility for advanced accelerator experimental tests”, Phys. Rev. Accelerators and Beams, 22, 101301 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Phys. Rept. 1010 (2023), arXiv:2203.00019 [hep-ph]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Ruf, G.R. Mocken, C. Muller, K.Z. Hatsagortsyan, C.H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 080402, arXiv:0810.4047 [physics.atom-ph]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. G.V. Dunne, H. Gies and R. Schützhold, Phys. Rev. D 80 111301, arXiv:0908.0948 [hepph]. [Google Scholar]
  9. L. V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1307 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Brézin and C. Itzykson, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1191 (1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N. B. Narozhny, A. I. Nikishov, Yad. Fis. 11 (1970) 1072 [Sov. Journ. Phys. 11 (1970) 596]. [Google Scholar]
  12. V. S. Popov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 62 (1972) 1248 [Sov. Phys. JETP 35 (1972) 569]. [Google Scholar]
  13. I.K. Affleck, O. Alvarez and N.S. Manton, Nucl. Phys. B 197 (1982) 509–519. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D 72 105004 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0507174. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Kluger, J. M. Eisenberg, B. Svetitsky, F. Cooper and E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2427 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Kluger, J. M. Eisenberg, B. Svetitsky, F. Cooper and E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 45, 4659 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Schmidt, D. Blaschke, G. Röpke, S. A. Smolyansky, A. V. Prozorkevich and V. D. Toneev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 7 (1998) 709, arXiv: hep-ph/9809227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D 78, 061701 (2008), arXiv:0807.2785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 40 749 (1932). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Vasak, M. Gyulassy and H.-T. Elze, Ann. Phys. 173 462 (1987). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Bialynicki-Birula, P. Góritzki and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. D 44 1825 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Ochs and U. Heinz, Ann. Phys. 266, 351 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer and H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105026 (2010), arXiv:1007.1099 [hep-ph]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Hebenstreit, “Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous electric fields”, PhD thesis, Graz University, 2011, arXiv:1106.5965 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Hebenstreit, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund and J. Zamanian, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 065007, arXiv:1011.1923 [hep-ph]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Kohlfürst, “Electron-positron pair production in inhomogeneous electromagnetic fields”, PhD thesis, Graz University, 2015, arXiv:1512.06082 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Diez, R. Alkofer and C. Kohlfürst, Phys. Lett. B 844 (2023) 138063, arXiv: 2211.07510 [hep-ph]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 80 (1950) 440. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105002 (2002), hep-th/0005078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 73, 065020 (2006), hep-th/0301132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D 75, 045013 (2007), hep-th/0701047. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. I. Nikishov, Nucl. Phys. B 21 (1970) 346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Gies and K. Klingmüller, Phys. Rev. D 72, 065001 (2005), hep-ph/0505099. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. G. V. Dunne, Q.-h. Wang, H. Gies and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D 73 065028 (2006), hep-th/0602176. [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Schneider and R. Schützhold, JHEP (2016) 164, arXiv:1407.3584 [hep-th]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S.L. Lebedev and V.I. Ritus, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 86 (1984) 408 [JETP 59 (1984) 237]. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D 84 125028 (2011), arXiv:1110.0900 [hep-th]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Huet, S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125033, arXiv:1411.3074 [hep-th]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. N. Ahmadiniaz, A.M. Fedotov, E.G. Gelfer, S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Phys. Rev. D 108, 036019 (2023); arXiv:2205.15946 [hep-th]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.