Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 302, 2024
Joint International Conference on Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications + Monte Carlo (SNA + MC 2024)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 10
Section Monte-Carlo Transport Codes: Algorithms, HPC & GPU
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430204006
Published online 15 October 2024
  1. M. Aufiero, A. Bidaud, and M. Hursin, “A collision history-based approach to sensitivity/perturbation calculations in the continuous energy Monte Carlo code SERPENT,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Nagaya and T. Mori, “Impact of perturbed fission source on the effective multiplication factor in monte carlo perturbation calculations,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 428–441, 2005, DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2005.9726411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. B. C. Kiedrowski, “Review of Early 21st-Century Monte Carlo Perturbation and Sensitivity Techniques for k-Eigenvalue Radiation Transport Calculations,” NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Kiedrowski and F. Brown, “AdjointWeighted Tallies for k-Eigenvalue Calculations with Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Rababah and A. Bidaud, “Computation of Sensitivity in Monte-Carlo codes: Investigation of Convergence for Reactor Cores with High Dominance Ratio,” presented at the International Conference on Physics of Reactors (PHYSOR 2024), San Francisco, CA, 2024, DOI: 10.13182/PHYSOR24-43648. [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Lopez and A. Bidaud, Sensitivity analysis and its convergence through Monte Carlo calculations for the UAM Gen-III benchmark: application to power distributions. United States: ANS - American Nuclear Society, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:54081746 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Ivanova and M. Avramova, “Benchmarks for Uncertainty Analysis in Modelling (UAM) for the Design, Operation and Safety Analysis of LWRs - Volume I: Specification and Support Data for Neutronics Cases (Phase I),” Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Dumonteil and T. Courau, “Dominance Ratio Assessment and Monte Carlo Criticality Simulations: Dealing with High Dominance Ratio Systems,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 120–131, 2010, DOI: 10.13182/NT10-A10899. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. B. Nelson, “Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives,” AIAA Journal, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1201–1205, 1976, DOI: 10.2514/3.7211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Aufiero and M. Fratoni, “A new approach to the stabilization and convergence acceleration in coupled Monte Carlo-CFD calculations: The Newton method via Monte Carlo perturbation theory,” 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. B. Chadwick and et al., “ENDF/B-VII. 1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data,” Nuclear Data Sheets, vol. 112, pp. 2887–2996, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Aufiero, M. Martin, and M. Frat, “XGPT: Extending Monte Carlo Generalized Perturbation Theory capabilities to continuous-energy sensitivity functions,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.