EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 338 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 338 (2025) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2025
ANIMMA 2025 – Advancements in Nuclear Instrumentation Measurement Methods and their Applications
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Space Sciences and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202533802001
Published online 06 November 2025
  1. A. Meuris et al., “Caliste 64, an innovative CdTe hard X-Ray micro-camera,” in 2007 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., Honolulu, HI, USA, 2007, pp. 2551–2557, doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2007.4436671 [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Limousin et al., “Caliste 256: A CdTe imaging spectrometer for space science with a 580μm pixel pitch,” NIM-A, vol. 647, no. 1, pp. 46–54, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.05.011. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Meuris et al., “Caliste HD: A new fine pitch Cd(Zn)Te imaging spectrometer from 2 keV up to 1 MeV,” in 2011 IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. Valencia, Spain, 2011, pp. 4485–4488, doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6154695. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Meuris et al., “Caliste-SO, a CdTe based spectrometer for bright solar event observations in hard X-rays,” NIM-A, vol. 787, pp. 72–77, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.11.021. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Krucker et al., “The Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX),” A&A, vol. 642, p. A15, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937362. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Massa et al., “Imaging from STIX visibility amplitudes,” A&A, vol. 656, p. A25, Dec. 2021 doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140946. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. A. S. Reid et al., “The Solar Particle Acceleration Radiation and Kinetics (SPARK) Mission Concept,” Aerospace, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 1034, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/aerospace10121034. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. D. Bongiorno et al., “Assembly of the FOXSI-4 mirror modules,” in Proc. SPIE 12679, San Diego, CA, USA, 2023, pp. 81–92. doi: 10.1117/12.2676955. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. E. Thomas, “SuperHERO (Super-High Energy Replicated Optics) balloon mission concept,” in Proc. SPIE 13093, Yokohama, Japan, 2024, doi: 10.1117/12.3020830. [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Takahashi et al., “High-resolution Schottky CdTe diode for hard X-ray and gamma-ray astronomy,” NIM-A, vol. 436, no. 1, pp. 111–119, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00606-3. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Baudin et al., “D2R1: A 2-D X-Ray Detector for CdTe-Based Fine Pitch and High-Energy Resolution Imaging Spectroscopy,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1408–1415, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2018.2845461. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. De Geronimo and P. O’Connor, “A CMOS fully compensated continuous reset system,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1458–1462, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1109/23.872996. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Allaire et al., “First light of MC2 -1K, a 250 μm pixel pitch CdTe imaging spectrometer for hard X-ray astronomy,” NIM-A, vol. 1046, p. 167663, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2022.167663. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Bouyjou, O. Gevin, O. Limousin and E. Delagnes, “A 32-Channel 13-b ADC for Space Applications,”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1071–1079, April 2017, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2672863. [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Takahashi et al., “The ASTRO-H (Hitomi) x-ray astronomy satellite,” in Proc. SPIE 9905, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2016, pp. 212–228. doi: 10.1117/12.2232379. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Gehrels et al., “The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission,” ApJ, vol. 611, pp. 1005–1020, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1086/422091. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Götz et al., “The scientific performance of the microchannel X-ray telescope on board the SVOM mission,” Exp. Astron., vol. 55, pp. 487–519, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10686-022-09881-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Maier, O. Limousin, and G. Daniel, “Energy calibration via correlation using an adaptive mesh refinement,” EPJ Web Conf., vol. 225, p. 01003, 2020, doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202022501003. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Newville et al., “LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Squares Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python”, Zenodo, 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15014437. [Google Scholar]
  20. D. M. Santos and F. Dupertuis, “Mass distributions marginalized over per-event errors,” NIM-A, vol. 764, pp. 150–155, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.06.081. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. E. Bolotnikov, W. R. Cook, F. A. Harrison, A.-S. Wong, S. M. Schindler, and A. C. Eichelberger, “Charge loss between contacts of CdZnTe pixel detectors,” NIM-A, vol. 432, no. 2, pp. 326–331, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00388-5. [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Boulfani, A. Meuris, D. Baudin, O. Gevin, and O. Limousin, “ANAQIN-X: A prototype low noise ASIC for the readout of highly dense semiconductor X-ray detectors”, submitted in these proceedings. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.