Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 340, 2025
Powders & Grains 2025 – 10th International Conference on Micromechanics on Granular Media
Article Number 04014
Number of page(s) 4
Section Jamming, Rigidity and Shear-Thickening Transitions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534004014
Published online 01 December 2025
  1. J. Blouwolff, S. Fraden, The coordination number of granular cylinders, Europhysics Letters 76, 1095 (2006). 10.1209/epl/i2006-10376-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. C. Ball, R. Blumenfeld, Stress Field in Granular Systems: Loop Forces and Potential Formulation, Physical Review Letters 88, 115505 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. van Hecke, Jamming of soft particles: geometry, mechanics, scaling and isostaticity, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 22, 033101 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  4. F. M. Schaller, M. Neudecker, M. Saadatfar, G. W. Delaney, G. E. Schröder-Turk, M. Schröter, Local Origin of Global Contact Numbers in Frictional Ellipsoid Packings, Physical Review Letters 114, 158001 (2015). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.158001 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Baule, R. Mari, L. Bo, L. Portal, H. A. Makse, Mean-field theory of random close packings of axisymmetric particles, Nature Comm. 4, 2194 (2013). 10.1038/ncomms3194 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Schröter, A local view on the role of friction and shape, EPJ Web of Conferences 140, 01008 (2017). 10.1051/epjconf/201714001008 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. P. Philipse, The random contact equation and its implications for (colloidal) rods in packings, suspensions, and anisotropic powders, Langmuir 12, 1127 (1996). 10.1021/la950671o [Google Scholar]
  8. A. P. Philipse, Langmuir 12, 5971 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Onsager, The Effects of Shape on the Interaction of Colloidal Particles, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51, 627 (1949). [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Börzsönyi, R. Stannarius, Granular materials composed of shape-anisotropic grains, Soft Matter 9, 7401 (2013). 10.1039/C3SM50298H [Google Scholar]
  11. S. R. Williams, A. P. Philipse, Random packings of spheres and spherocylinders simulated by mechanical contraction, Phys. Rev. E 67, 051301 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wouterse, S. Luding, A. P. Philipse, On contact numbers in random rod packings, Granular Matter 11, 169 (2009). 10.1007/S10035-009-0126-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Rodney, M. Fivel, R. Dendievel, Discrete Modeling of the Mechanics of Entangled Materials, Physical Review Letters 95, 108004 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Desmond, S. V. Franklin, Jamming of threedimensional prolate granular materials, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031306 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031306 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. E. Dexter, B. L. Dronzek, R. R. Matsuo, Scanning electron microscopy of cooked spaghetti, Cereal Chem. 55, 23 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Bradley, G. Roth, Adaptive thresholding using integral image, Journal of Graphics Tools 12, 13 (2007). 10.1080/2151237X.2007.10129236 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Otsu, A threshold selection method from graylevel histograms, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9, 62 (1979). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. M. Schaller, M. Neudecker, M. Saadatfar, G. Delaney, K. Mecke, G. E. Schröder-Turk, M. Schröter, Tomographic analysis of jammed ellipsoid packings, AIP Conference Proceedings 1542, 377 (2013). 10.1063/1.4811946 [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Fu, Y. Xi, Y. Cao, Y. Wang, X-ray microtomography study of the compaction process of rods under tapping, Physical Review E 85, 051311 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.051311 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Zhao, S. Li, R. Zou, A. Yu, Dense random packings of spherocylinders, Soft Matter 8, 1003 (2012). 10.1039/C1SM06487H [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Ekman, A. Miettinen, T. Tallinen, J. Timonen, Contact Formation in Random Networks of Elongated Objects, Physical Review Letters 113, 268001 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.268001 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.