EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 341 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 341 (2025) 01030 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 341, 2025
2nd International Conference on Advent Trends in Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (ICATCICT 2025)
Article Number 01030
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534101030
Published online 20 November 2025
  1. R. M. McEwen, "Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 3, pp. 171-179, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. A. Healey and R. W. Picard, "Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 156-166, Jun. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Jenke, A. Peer, and M. Buss, "Feature extraction and selection for emotion recognition from EEG," IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 327-339, Jul.-Sep. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Hosseini, B. Khalilzadeh, and A. Naghibi-Sistani, "Classifying emotional stress using EEG signals and machine learning algorithms," in Proc. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2010, pp. 60626065. [Google Scholar]
  5. U. R. Acharya, S. L. Oh, Y. Hagiwara, J. H. Tan, and H. Adeli, "Deep convolutional neural network for the automated detection and diagnosis of seizure using EEG signals," Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 100, pp. 270-278, Sep. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Abdel-Basset, R. Mohamed, and F. Smarandache, "A hybrid whale optimization algorithm based on local search strategy for the permutation flow shop scheduling problem," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 85, pp. 129-145, Aug. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Li, S. Zhong, J. Liu, Y. Liu, and L. Pan, "EEG-based emotion recognition using attention-driven LSTM and domain adversarial training," IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 1281-1291, Jun. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. S. Kim and H. S. Jo, "Decision tree models for EEG-based stress detection: A comparative study," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 12345-12356, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Zhang et al., "Ensemble learning for EEG-based mental state classification," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, p. 3100, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Gupta et al., "Comparative study of machine learning classifiers for stress detection using EEG signals," Healthcare Technology Letters, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 120126, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. A. Khan et al., "KNN-based classification for mental workload detection using EEG," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 68, p. 102813, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Alhagry, A. A. Fahmy, and R. A. El-Khoribi, "Emotion recognition based on EEG using LSTM recurrent neural networks," International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 355-358, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Li et al., "Hybrid CNN-LSTM model for EEG-based emotion and stress detection," IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, early access, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Sharma et al., "StressNet: Hybrid CNN-LSTM for stress detection from EEG," Results in Control and Optimization, vol. 11, art. 100231, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. M. R. Islam et al., "A survey of optimization algorithms in EEG feature selection," Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 72, p. 103273, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Wang et al., "Metaheuristic optimization for EEG feature selection: A review," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 214, art. 119118, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Ajit and A. Paithane, "Optimized EEG-based stress detection: A novel approach," Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2607-2616, 2024. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.